Skip to content

No labels!

There aren’t any labels for this repository quite yet.

26 labels

Sort
Sort
Alphabetically
Reverse alphabetically
Most issues
Fewest issues
do not merge
do not merge
Blocks merging a PR
help wanted
help wanted
Good issues for community members to address
2
meeting: discuss
meeting: discuss
This issue should be discussed at the next TC49-TG2 meeting
8
meeting: proposal
meeting: proposal
There is an informal proposal in the issue, worth discussing in a meeting
1
resolved: by-design
resolved: by-design
The issue was examined, and we decided it wasn't a problem after all
resolved: duplicate
resolved: duplicate
This issue is already in another issue
resolved: fixed
resolved: fixed
This was fixed by a change (which should be linked)
resolved: known-deviation
resolved: known-deviation
We know Roslyn deviates from the spec, but we don't want to change the spec
resolved: wontfix
resolved: wontfix
The issue was examined, and we decided to live with it
Review: complete
Review: complete
at least one person has reviewed this
Review: in progress
Review: in progress
at least one person is reviewing this
Review: pending
Review: pending
Proposal is available for review
11
Review: work pending
Review: work pending
status: dependency
status: dependency
This issue or PR depends on another (see comments)
1
status: gnarly
status: gnarly
This issue is likely to require very significant work to resolve
8
status: good first issue
status: good first issue
Good for newcomers
status: in-progress
status: in-progress
The assignee has actively started working on this; consult with them before taking other actions
2
status: needs triaging
status: needs triaging
6
status: proposal approved
status: proposal approved
A proposal discussed with a "meeting: proposal" label has been approved; next step is a PR
type: bug
type: bug
The Standard does not describe the language as intended or implemented
55
type: clarity
type: clarity
While not technically incorrect, the Standard is potentially confusing
73
type: feature
type: feature
This issue describes a new feature
28
type: formatting
type: formatting
The Standard has incorrect formatting (or a typo)
1
type: future bug 🌈
type: future bug :rainbow:
Issues identified that become issues in a future spec version
1
type: process
type: process
This issue relates to processes
1
type: tools
type: tools
This issue (or PR) relates to a tool, not the Standard