Update RemoteEndpointMessageProperty.xml

[ronnelsantiago]

Should it say sent?

Summary

Describe your changes here.

Fixes #Issue_Number (if available)

[learn-build-service-prod]

Learn Build status updates of commit 7946e97:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
xml/System.ServiceModel.Channels/RemoteEndpointMessageProperty.xml	✅Succeeded	View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Learn support channel

[mconnew]

The grammar and phrasing used is confusing but I believe the original text is correct. The misunderstanding is because of how poorly the description was written. The word received is in context of "from" so it's saying a message was received and the ip address and port is for where the message came from.
The whole sentence could do with being reworded to be less confusing, but received is correct with the current text.

[mconnew]

I had another look at the text and I understand why it's worded awkwardly. It's not always the ip address of the sender. If there's a relay in the middle such as an HTTP proxy, it will be the source IP address and port number of the connection from the HTTP proxy. The term sender implies the original source of the message so that would be misleading. It could maybe be reworded as saying it's usually the ip of the sender and then add if a relay or proxy is involved, then it will instead be the ip of the the relay or proxy that connected to the service. It's wordier but I think would be clearer.

[mconnew]

Original text was correct, just a little confusing. Either leave as is or reword the entire paragraph to make it less confusing.

[Daniel182020]

Should it say sent?
sent

Summary

the house of God.json

Describe your changes here.
Daniel182020
Fixes #Issue_Number (if a
God keep wallet.json
vailable)