Adjust for timeout issues - #354
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the GitHub Actions evaluation workflow scheduling and timeout configuration to reduce scheduled run cancellations/timeouts impacting the repository’s evaluation pipeline.
Changes:
- Adjust the scheduled evaluation cron frequency from every 3 hours to every 5 hours.
- Increase the
evaluatejob timeout from 90 minutes to 150 minutes.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
.github/workflows/evaluation.yml |
Reduces scheduled trigger frequency to mitigate overlapping runs/cancellations. |
.github/workflows/evaluation-run.yml |
Extends evaluation job timeout to better accommodate longer runs. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.
Skill Validation Results
[1] (Plugin) Quality unchanged but weighted score is -3.5% due to: tokens (23949 → 49874), tool calls (2 → 4)
Model: claude-opus-4.6 | Judge: claude-opus-4.6 |
|
Several still timed out in table above. But an improvement |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Increases the GitHub Actions evaluation job timeout to reduce cancellation/timeouts for long-running evaluation runs (notably the dotnet-upgrade matrix leg), improving overall repository health signal and lowering workflow cancellation rates.
Changes:
- Increase
evaluatejob timeout from 90 minutes to 180 minutes in the reusable evaluation workflow.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.
Skill Validation Results
[1] (Isolated) Quality unchanged but weighted score is -25.0% due to: completion (✓ → ✗), tokens (11871 → 49060), tool calls (0 → 3), time (10.6s → 24.6s)
Model: claude-opus-4.6 | Judge: claude-opus-4.6 |
Mativation
Prevention from high cancelation rate (#288 (comment))