Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update NatashaExceptionAnalyzer.cs #339

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

Update NatashaExceptionAnalyzer.cs #339

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

NMSAzulX
Copy link
Collaborator

@NMSAzulX NMSAzulX commented Jul 1, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced error handling to select the first error more accurately.
    • Improved clarity and detail of error messages for better troubleshooting.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update focuses on enhancing the NatashaExceptionAnalyzer class within the Natasha.CSharp.Compiler.Component.Exception namespace. The modifications improve the robustness of error handling by refining the logic to select the first error using FirstOrDefault and enhancing the error message handling for exceptions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Component/Exception/NatashaExceptionAnalyzer.cs Updated the class to use FirstOrDefault for more robust error selection and enhanced exception message handling.

Poem

In the code quite neat and tight,
Errors now face a refined plight.
With FirstOrDefault, no more despair,
Messages handled with tender care.
Here's to robust, better nights,
🐇✨ Code in peaceful flights!


Tip

Early access features: disabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@NMSAzulX NMSAzulX added the pr_src 此次提交包含 [源码工程] 相关的改动. label Jul 1, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2024

UT Test - Ubuntu

1 tests   1 ✅  0s ⏱️
1 suites  0 💤
1 files    0 ❌

Results for commit ae62595.

@NMSAzulX
Copy link
Collaborator Author

NMSAzulX commented Jul 1, 2024

@coderabbitai review

@NMSAzulX
Copy link
Collaborator Author

NMSAzulX commented Jul 1, 2024

未检测到合适的 ISSUE 推荐给您。感谢您的反馈!

该条自动推荐信息来自于 nms-bot.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2024

UT Test - Windows

1 tests   1 ✅  0s ⏱️
1 suites  0 💤
1 files    0 ❌

Results for commit ae62595.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 94044e2 and ae62595.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Component/Exception/NatashaExceptionAnalyzer.cs (2 hunks)

Comment on lines +16 to +22
if (errors.Length > 0)
{
var first = errors[0];
var first = errors.FirstOrDefault(item => item.DefaultSeverity == DiagnosticSeverity.Error);
if (first == null)
{
first = errors[0];
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refined error selection logic using FirstOrDefault.

The change to use FirstOrDefault for error selection based on DefaultSeverity is a good practice as it ensures that the most severe errors are handled first. However, consider adding a null check before accessing the errors array to prevent potential null reference exceptions.

- var errors = diagnostics.Where(item => !item.IsSuppressed).ToArray();
+ var errors = diagnostics.Where(item => !item.IsSuppressed).ToArray() ?? Array.Empty<Diagnostic>();

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Comment on lines +35 to +46
var first = errors.FirstOrDefault(item=>item.DefaultSeverity == DiagnosticSeverity.Error);
if (first == null)
{
first = errors[0];
}
var exception = new NatashaException(first.GetMessage());
exception.Diagnostics.AddRange(errors);
if (first.Location.SourceTree!=null)
if (first.Location.SourceTree != null)
{
exception.Formatter = first.Location.SourceTree.ToString();
}
else if(compilation.SyntaxTrees.Length > 0)
else if (compilation.SyntaxTrees.Length > 0)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated error handling in GetCompileException.

The use of FirstOrDefault to prioritize errors based on DefaultSeverity is consistent with the changes in GetSyntaxException. Consider adding a null check for first.Location.SourceTree to ensure robustness.

- if (first.Location.SourceTree != null)
+ if (first?.Location.SourceTree != null)
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
var first = errors.FirstOrDefault(item=>item.DefaultSeverity == DiagnosticSeverity.Error);
if (first == null)
{
first = errors[0];
}
var exception = new NatashaException(first.GetMessage());
exception.Diagnostics.AddRange(errors);
if (first.Location.SourceTree!=null)
if (first.Location.SourceTree != null)
{
exception.Formatter = first.Location.SourceTree.ToString();
}
else if(compilation.SyntaxTrees.Length > 0)
else if (compilation.SyntaxTrees.Length > 0)
var first = errors.FirstOrDefault(item=>item.DefaultSeverity == DiagnosticSeverity.Error);
if (first == null)
{
first = errors[0];
}
var exception = new NatashaException(first.GetMessage());
exception.Diagnostics.AddRange(errors);
if (first?.Location.SourceTree != null)
{
exception.Formatter = first.Location.SourceTree.ToString();
}
else if (compilation.SyntaxTrees.Length > 0)

@NMSAzulX NMSAzulX merged commit 14334f9 into dev.next Jul 1, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr_src 此次提交包含 [源码工程] 相关的改动.
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant