Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

优化 HE 输出以及修复 依赖库无法发出通知的 BUG #343

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2024

Conversation

NMSAzulX
Copy link
Collaborator

@NMSAzulX NMSAzulX commented Jul 4, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of file paths and ensured proper cleanup before logging in hot execution.
    • Corrected references and namespace qualifications for Windows Forms to avoid ambiguity.
  • New Features

    • Enhanced window disposal and UI thread handling in the WPF writer.
    • Added conditional checks for handling specific file types in the deployment monitor.
  • Refactor

    • Replaced Console.WriteLine with Debug.WriteLine for debugging output.
    • Renamed event handlers for better clarity in file watcher components.
  • Chores

    • Removed unnecessary debug messages and added informative log messages for hot execution steps.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates primarily involve path updates, namespace specifications, and improved file handling logic across various components. These changes ensure more robust referencing, enhanced debugging capabilities, and better organization of file system event handlers, ultimately leading to a more reliable and maintainable codebase for handling dynamic windows forms, WPF functionalities, and file watching operations.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/Natasha.CSharp/.../HotExecutorGenerator.cs Updated debugFilePath, deleted all files in HEOutputPath before creating new HEFileLogger.
src/Natasha.CSharp/.../WinformRewriter.cs Fully qualified class namespaces for Application, Form, and used System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Run for running tasks.
src/Natasha.CSharp/.../WpfWriter.cs Restructured Handle method, added window disposal, exception handling, and debugging output.
src/Natasha.CSharp/.../VSCSharpMainFileWatcher.cs Added conditional file type checks and adjusted logic for file availability and type handling in DeployMonitor method.
src/Natasha.CSharp/.../VSCSharpProjectFileWatcher.cs Replaced Console.WriteLine with Debug.WriteLine for debug output; renamed and organized event handlers for file changes.
src/Natasha.CSharp/.../HEProxy.cs Removed specific debug messages, added notification for completion of entry callback execution, added logic for handling errors.

Poem

In the code where lines entwine,
Paths aligned, namespaces to refine.
Debuggers cleaned, forms now aware,
Tasks to run, with utmost care.
Watchers vigilant, handlers clear,
Hot executors hum without fear.
Bugs now scattered, gone and rare.
✨🍂 Happy coders, everywhere! 🍂✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@NMSAzulX
Copy link
Collaborator Author

NMSAzulX commented Jul 4, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2024

UT Test - Ubuntu

1 tests   1 ✅  0s ⏱️
1 suites  0 💤
1 files    0 ❌

Results for commit 70bffdb.

@NMSAzulX
Copy link
Collaborator Author

NMSAzulX commented Jul 4, 2024

未检测到合适的 ISSUE 推荐给您。感谢您的反馈!

该条自动推荐信息来自于 nms-bot.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2024

UT Test - Windows

1 tests   1 ✅  0s ⏱️
1 suites  0 💤
1 files    0 ❌

Results for commit 70bffdb.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7344751 and 70bffdb.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG/HotExecutorGenerator.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Component/SyntaxUtils/WinformRewriter.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Component/SyntaxUtils/WpfWriter.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Component/VSCSharpProjectInfomation.cs (3 hunks)
  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Component/WatcherUtils/VSCSharpMainFileWatcher.cs (6 hunks)
  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Component/WatcherUtils/VSCSharpProjectFileWatcher.cs (5 hunks)
  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/HEProxy.cs (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (16)
src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Component/SyntaxUtils/WpfWriter.cs (3)

57-57: Debug output statement.

The debug output statement is used to print the parsed statement. Ensure that this output is useful for debugging purposes.


14-47: Verify the correctness of window disposal logic.

The changes ensure that all windows are closed properly and include exception handling. Verify that the logic handles all edge cases and does not leave any windows open.


49-57: Verify the correctness of hot execution callback setup.

The changes set up a callback for hot execution and include debug output. Verify that the callback is set up correctly and that the debug output is accurate.

src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Component/VSCSharpProjectInfomation.cs (1)

Line range hint 20-33:
Verify the correctness of output path setup.

The changes ensure that the HEOutputPath is set correctly. Verify that the output path is set up correctly and that it handles all edge cases.

src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Component/SyntaxUtils/WinformRewriter.cs (1)

50-99: Verify the correctness of namespace qualification and task execution.

The changes ensure proper class and namespace referencing for Windows Forms functionality. Verify that the namespace qualification and task execution handle all edge cases and do not introduce any issues.

Verification successful

Namespace qualification and task execution verified.

The namespace qualification and task execution have been verified and are implemented correctly. The DiposeWindows method and Task.Run usage are consistent and handle exceptions properly.

  • WinformRewriter.cs: Namespace qualification and task execution.
  • DiposeWindows method: Proper implementation without threading issues.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of namespace qualification and task execution.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Proper handling of namespace qualification and task execution.
rg --type cs 'System.Windows.Forms'

Length of output: 3158


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct usage and implementation of Task.Run and the DiposeWindows method.

# Test: Search for the usage of Task.Run. Expect: Proper handling of task execution.
rg --type cs 'Task.Run'

# Test: Search for the implementation of DiposeWindows method. Expect: Proper implementation without threading issues or exceptions.
rg --type cs 'DiposeWindows'

Length of output: 1091


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the full implementation of the DiposeWindows method and review the context of Task.Run usage.

# Extract the implementation of the DiposeWindows method.
ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern $'static bool DiposeWindows() { $$$ }'

# Extract the context of Task.Run usage.
rg --context 10 'Task.Run' --type cs

Length of output: 11931

src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Component/WatcherUtils/VSCSharpMainFileWatcher.cs (5)

55-59: Ensure proper handling of XAML and RESX files.

The conditional check for XAML and RESX files is correctly implemented. Ensure the ExecuteAfterFunction method properly handles these file types.


Line range hint 60-69:
Verify file availability check.

The conditional check for file availability is correctly implemented. Ensure the CreateFileAction and ExecuteAfterFunction methods handle the file correctly.


81-85: Ensure proper handling of XAML and RESX files.

The conditional check for XAML and RESX files is correctly implemented. Ensure the ExecuteAfterFunction method properly handles these file types.


Line range hint 86-96:
Verify file availability check.

The conditional check for file availability is correctly implemented. Ensure the DeleteFileAction and ExecuteAfterFunction methods handle the file correctly.


105-111: Ensure proper handling of renamed XAML and RESX files.

The conditional check for XAML and RESX files is correctly implemented. Ensure the ExecuteAfterFunction method properly handles these file types.

src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Component/WatcherUtils/VSCSharpProjectFileWatcher.cs (4)

32-32: Appropriate use of Debug.WriteLine for debug output.

Replacing Console.WriteLine with Debug.WriteLine is appropriate for debug output.


49-49: Appropriate use of Debug.WriteLine for debug output.

Replacing Console.WriteLine with Debug.WriteLine is appropriate for debug output.


132-140: Improved readability with renamed event handlers.

Renaming handler to csFileHandler improves code readability and clarity.


147-161: Improved readability with renamed event handlers.

Renaming reNameHandler to csRenameHandler and adding csprojFileHandler and csprojRenameHandler improves code readability and clarity.

src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/HEProxy.cs (2)

349-349: Appropriate addition of completion message.

The message indicating the completion of the entry callback method execution is appropriate and improves logging.


370-378: Ensure proper handling of error files.

The added logic to handle error files during hot execution is correctly implemented. Ensure this logic is thoroughly tested.

Comment on lines +21 to +29
string debugFilePath = Path.Combine(VSCSharpProjectInfomation.HEOutputPath,""Debug.txt"");
if (Directory.Exists(VSCSharpProjectInfomation.HEOutputPath))
{
var files = Directory.GetFiles(VSCSharpProjectInfomation.HEOutputPath);
foreach (var file in files)
{
File.Delete(file);
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Issues found in file deletion logic.

The file deletion logic does not explicitly handle edge cases such as read-only files, hidden files, or files in use. This could lead to incomplete deletion of files in the output path.

  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG/HotExecutorGenerator.cs: File deletion logic at line 25.
Analysis chain

Verify the correctness of file deletion logic.

The changes ensure that all files in the output path are deleted before creating a new logger. Verify that the deletion logic handles all edge cases and does not leave any files undeleted.


Verify the robustness of file deletion logic.

The changes ensure that all files in the output path are deleted before creating a new logger. Verify that the deletion logic correctly handles edge cases such as read-only files, hidden files, or files in use.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of file deletion logic.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Proper deletion of all files in the output path.
rg --type cs 'Directory.GetFiles'

Length of output: 1930


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the robustness of file deletion logic by checking for edge cases.

# Test: Search for additional handling of edge cases in file deletion logic.
rg --type cs 'File.Delete'

Length of output: 805

Comment on lines +98 to +101
public static bool IsXamlAndResxFile(string file)
{
return file.EndsWith(".xaml") || file.EndsWith(".resx");
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Improve the IsXamlAndResxFile method to handle edge cases.

The current implementation does not account for different casing or additional extensions. Consider using StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase to handle case insensitivity and regex to match the exact extensions.

  • Update the method to handle case insensitivity and exact matches for .xaml and .resx files:

    public static bool IsXamlAndResxFile(string file)
    {
        return file.EndsWith(".xaml", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) || file.EndsWith(".resx", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
    }
  • Consider using regex for more robust matching:

    using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
    
    public static bool IsXamlAndResxFile(string file)
    {
        return Regex.IsMatch(file, @"\.xaml(\?.*)?$", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase) || Regex.IsMatch(file, @"\.resx(\?.*)?$", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
    }
Analysis chain

Verify the correctness of file type check.

The method ensures that the file extension is either .xaml or .resx. Verify that the file type check handles all edge cases.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of file type check.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Proper handling of XAML and RESX file types.
rg --type cs 'IsXamlAndResxFile'

Length of output: 844


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the code snippets from VSCSharpMainFileWatcher.cs where IsXamlAndResxFile method is used

# Search for the method usage and display 5 lines of context around each match
rg --type cs 'IsXamlAndResxFile' -A 5 -B 5 src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Component/WatcherUtils/VSCSharpMainFileWatcher.cs

Length of output: 1284


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the correctness of file type check in IsXamlAndResxFile method by testing edge cases

# Create a temporary C# file to test the method
cat <<EOF > /tmp/TestIsXamlAndResxFile.cs
using System;

public class Test
{
    public static bool IsXamlAndResxFile(string file)
    {
        return file.EndsWith(".xaml", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) || file.EndsWith(".resx", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
    }

    public static void Main()
    {
        string[] testFiles = {
            "file.xaml",
            "file.resx",
            "file.XAML",
            "file.RESX",
            "file.xaml.bak",
            "file.resx.bak",
            "file.xaml?version=1",
            "file.resx?version=1"
        };

        foreach (var file in testFiles)
        {
            Console.WriteLine($"\{file}: {IsXamlAndResxFile(file)}");
        }
    }
}
EOF

# Compile and run the temporary C# file
mcs /tmp/TestIsXamlAndResxFile.cs -out:/tmp/TestIsXamlAndResxFile.exe
mono /tmp/TestIsXamlAndResxFile.exe

Length of output: 260


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the IsXamlAndResxFile method definition and its usage in the repository

# Find the method definition
rg --type cs 'public static bool IsXamlAndResxFile' -A 10

# Find all usages of the IsXamlAndResxFile method
rg --type cs 'IsXamlAndResxFile'

Length of output: 2481

@NMSAzulX NMSAzulX merged commit 559d3c1 into dev.next Jul 4, 2024
8 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant