Skip to content

Add reference tests for the Request Blocklist feature#152

Merged
kzar merged 1 commit intoduckduckgo:mainfrom
kzar:request-blocklist
Oct 18, 2025
Merged

Add reference tests for the Request Blocklist feature#152
kzar merged 1 commit intoduckduckgo:mainfrom
kzar:request-blocklist

Conversation

@kzar
Copy link
Collaborator

@kzar kzar commented Oct 16, 2025

No description provided.

"exceptPlatforms": []
},
{
"name": "matching rule, case considered",
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dharb So far I went with case-sensitive matching. My thinking there is that case-sensitive matching is both more efficient + more powerful. But that is at odds with the Tracker Allowlist which I think goes with case-insensitive matching. I'm open to either, WDYT?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kzar I don't think I even realized that the tracker allowlist isn't case sensitive. My take would be to go with case-sensitive matching here and let's just make sure to document it well.

@kzar kzar force-pushed the request-blocklist branch from 348700f to 91e2239 Compare October 16, 2025 14:59
Copy link
Contributor

@dharb dharb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kzar this is looking great, really nice work - appreciate your level of thoroughness in considering all of the potential edge cases.

@kzar kzar merged commit ba94680 into duckduckgo:main Oct 18, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants