Skip to content

fix: resolve privilege escalation vulnerability via mass assignment (#1851) - #1868

Open
atul-upadhyay-7 wants to merge 1 commit into
durdana3105:mainfrom
atul-upadhyay-7:fix/unrestricted-file-upload-1851
Open

fix: resolve privilege escalation vulnerability via mass assignment (#1851)#1868
atul-upadhyay-7 wants to merge 1 commit into
durdana3105:mainfrom
atul-upadhyay-7:fix/unrestricted-file-upload-1851

Conversation

@atul-upadhyay-7

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

This PR fixes the Privilege Escalation via Mass Assignment vulnerability described in #1851. The fix ensures that standard users cannot escalate their roles by injecting privileged fields (e.g., "is_admin": true` via the Supabase client to grant themselves administrative privileges, bypassing all authorization checks.

Changes

Database Layer (RLS Hardening)

  • New migration (20260727000000_fix_mass_assignment_privilege_escalation.sql):
    • Added to the RLS WITH CHECK clause, preventing users from self-promoting to admin
    • Added defense-in-depth trigger (prevent_privilege_escalation) that unconditionally blocks direct modification of and columns
    • Only SECURITY DEFINER functions (gamification RPCs) can modify these columns

Backend Layer (Server-Side Validation)

  • New validation schema (backend/validation/schemas.js):
    • Added with Zod validation that rejects unknown keys
  • New secure endpoint (backend/routes/users.js):
    • Added with strict field whitelisting
    • Only allows safe fields: name, bio, skills, avatar_url, interests, teach_subjects, learn_subjects
    • Explicitly blocks and logs privilege escalation attempts (is_admin, is_mentor, points, role, etc.)
    • Enforces ownership check (users can only update their own profile)

Frontend Layer (Defense-in-Depth)

  • Updated src/pages/EditProfile.tsx: Uses new secure backend endpoint instead of direct Supabase client
  • Updated src/pages/Profile.tsx: Uses new secure backend endpoint instead of direct Supabase client

Security Architecture

The fix implements defense-in-depth across three layers:

  1. Database RLS — WITH CHECK clause prevents privileged column mutation
  2. Database Trigger — Unconditionally blocks is_admin/is_mentor changes from direct SQL
  3. Backend Validation — Zod + field whitelisting rejects unknown/restricted fields
  4. Backend Logging — All privilege escalation attempts are logged for audit

Testing

  • TypeScript compilation: ✅ Clean (no errors)
  • Security tests: ✅ 5/5 passed
  • All unit tests: ✅ 37/37 passed

Fixes #1851

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@atul-upadhyay-7 is attempting to deploy a commit to the durdana3105's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@atul-upadhyay-7, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 50 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 79e88c34-0bbc-4ed4-b2b8-182936e2ac7e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3565841 and b15d90a.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • backend/routes/users.js
  • backend/validation/schemas.js
  • src/pages/EditProfile.tsx
  • src/pages/Profile.tsx
  • supabase/migrations/20260727000000_fix_mass_assignment_privilege_escalation.sql
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

High Priority: Privilege Escalation Vulnerability in User Roles Management

1 participant