Looks like I just made a duplicate feature of #41 ... but my PR includes tests for the feature.
Choice is up to you, @echovl .

Regarding the StakeAddress management this and #41 are pretty equivalent, I can split #41 to just add easy-to-use bech32 end/dec, and get this merged.
Pls @echovl give us a feedback

@safanaj it was too late when I finished implementing StakeAddress management on my own and later found out you've done similar work in #41 PR...
I would appreciate it if you could split your PR to only include bech32 utilities and have it merged first because I think my PR takes care of more address-wise changes (baseAddress, some function changes in Wallet, tests...). Then, I'll update my code with some of your new works.

@echovl Could you allow few more people to review PRs and have write access to the repo so that they can merge PRs as well? Hope this repo to be a bit more responsive and prosper :)

@safanaj it was too late when I finished implementing StakeAddress management on my own and later found out you've done similar work in #41 PR... I would appreciate it if you could split your PR to only include bech32 utilities and have it merged first because I think my PR takes care of more address-wise changes (baseAddress, some function changes in Wallet, tests...). Then, I'll update my code with some of your new works.

Agree, yes I will. Only I saw that on my PR in address.go there are 2 typo fixes in the NewAddressFromBytes constructor, regarding the error message for Ptr address type if those make sense to you too add them.

@echovl if you are still short with time probably as suggested by @kevink1103 you could allow us to review and merge.

@safanaj Thank you! I've just taken care of the typos you've mentioned. Let's wait for @echovl 's review!

As this PR will adopt changes from #41 , I will make this PR as draft for now so that #41 gets merged first. cc. @safanaj

Hi guys, sorry for the late reply, this looks good to me. Do we really need the bech32 PR merged first?

@echovl Hi, welcome back!
and whichever is fine for me. As soon as #41 PR gets merged, I can take advantage of prefixes defined there. So we can still merge this one first. I'll put this PR ready for review.

Just to follow up on this PR.
Since this PR has not been paid enough attention and reviewed, I have forked this repo and added more features on top of this PR.
https://github.com/ffdd/cardano-go

For those who are interested in this PR, use the forked one!