fix: typo

Author: wyfo

src/transport/multicast/rx.c

@@ -193,11 +193,11 @@ z_result_t _z_multicast_handle_transport_message(_z_transport_multicast_t *ztm,
             if (_Z_HAS_FLAG(t_msg->_header, _Z_FLAG_T_FRAME_R)) {
                 // @TODO: amend once reliability is in place. For the time being only
                 //        monotonic SNs are ensured
-                if (_z_sn_precedes(entry->_sn_res, entry->_sn_rx_sns._val._plain._reliable, t_msg->_body._frame._sn) ==
+                if (_z_sn_precedes(entry->_sn_res, entry->_sn_rx_sns._val._plain._reliable, t_msg->_body._fragment._sn) ==
                     true) {
                     bool consecutive = _z_sn_consecutive(entry->_sn_res, entry->_sn_rx_sns._val._plain._reliable,
                                                          t_msg->_body._fragment._sn);
-                    entry->_sn_rx_sns._val._plain._reliable = t_msg->_body._frame._sn;
+                    entry->_sn_rx_sns._val._plain._reliable = t_msg->_body._fragment._sn;
                     dbuf = &entry->_dbuf_reliable;
                     if (!consecutive) {
                         _Z_DEBUG("Non-consecutive fragments received");
@@ -211,10 +211,10 @@ z_result_t _z_multicast_handle_transport_message(_z_transport_multicast_t *ztm,
                 }
             } else {
                 if (_z_sn_precedes(entry->_sn_res, entry->_sn_rx_sns._val._plain._best_effort,
-                                   t_msg->_body._frame._sn)) {
+                                   t_msg->_body._fragment._sn)) {
                     bool consecutive = _z_sn_consecutive(entry->_sn_res, entry->_sn_rx_sns._val._plain._best_effort,
                                                          t_msg->_body._fragment._sn);
-                    entry->_sn_rx_sns._val._plain._best_effort = t_msg->_body._frame._sn;
+                    entry->_sn_rx_sns._val._plain._best_effort = t_msg->_body._fragment._sn;
                     dbuf = &entry->_dbuf_best_effort;
                     if (!consecutive) {
                         _Z_DEBUG("Non-consecutive fragments received");

src/transport/unicast/rx.c

@@ -146,10 +146,10 @@ z_result_t _z_unicast_handle_transport_message(_z_transport_unicast_t *ztu, _z_t
             if (_Z_HAS_FLAG(t_msg->_header, _Z_FLAG_T_FRAME_R)) {
                 // @TODO: amend once reliability is in place. For the time being only
                 //        monotonic SNs are ensured
-                if (_z_sn_precedes(ztu->_sn_res, ztu->_sn_rx_reliable, t_msg->_body._frame._sn)) {
+                if (_z_sn_precedes(ztu->_sn_res, ztu->_sn_rx_reliable, t_msg->_body._fragment._sn)) {
                     bool consecutive =
                         _z_sn_consecutive(ztu->_sn_res, ztu->_sn_rx_reliable, t_msg->_body._fragment._sn);
-                    ztu->_sn_rx_reliable = t_msg->_body._frame._sn;
+                    ztu->_sn_rx_reliable = t_msg->_body._fragment._sn;
                     dbuf = &ztu->_dbuf_reliable;
                     if (!consecutive) {
                         _Z_DEBUG("Non-consecutive fragments received");
@@ -162,10 +162,10 @@ z_result_t _z_unicast_handle_transport_message(_z_transport_unicast_t *ztu, _z_t
                     break;
                 }
             } else {
-                if (_z_sn_precedes(ztu->_sn_res, ztu->_sn_rx_best_effort, t_msg->_body._frame._sn)) {
+                if (_z_sn_precedes(ztu->_sn_res, ztu->_sn_rx_best_effort, t_msg->_body._fragment._sn)) {
                     bool consecutive =
                         _z_sn_consecutive(ztu->_sn_res, ztu->_sn_rx_best_effort, t_msg->_body._fragment._sn);
-                    ztu->_sn_rx_best_effort = t_msg->_body._frame._sn;
+                    ztu->_sn_rx_best_effort = t_msg->_body._fragment._sn;
                     dbuf = &ztu->_dbuf_best_effort;
                     if (!consecutive) {
                         _Z_DEBUG("Non-consecutive fragments received");