Skip to content

run fast eval without target - #2764

Draft
iluise wants to merge 11 commits into
develop-ssl-diffusion-v1from
iluise/develop-ssl-diffusion-v1/eval-no-target
Draft

run fast eval without target#2764
iluise wants to merge 11 commits into
develop-ssl-diffusion-v1from
iluise/develop-ssl-diffusion-v1/eval-no-target

Conversation

@iluise

@iluise iluise commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Issue Number

Is this PR a draft? Mark it as draft.

Checklist before asking for review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • My changes comply with basic sanity checks:
    • I have fixed formatting issues with ./scripts/actions.sh lint
    • I have run unit tests with ./scripts/actions.sh unit-test
    • I have documented my code and I have updated the docstrings.
    • I have added unit tests, if relevant
  • I have tried my changes with data and code:
    • I have run the integration tests with ./scripts/actions.sh integration-test
    • (bigger changes) I have run a full training and I have written in the comment the run_id(s): launch-slurm.py --time 60
    • (bigger changes and experiments) I have shared a hegdedoc in the github issue with all the configurations and runs for this experiments
  • I have informed and aligned with people impacted by my change:
    • for config changes: the MatterMost channels and/or a design doc
    • for changes of dependencies: the MatterMost software development channel

FastEvaluation

  • I have updated the public documentation if necessary

@iluise
iluise marked this pull request as draft August 14, 2026 14:01
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the eval anything related to the model evaluation pipeline label Aug 14, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the infra Issues related to infrastructure label Aug 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

eval anything related to the model evaluation pipeline infra Issues related to infrastructure

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant