Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix DataSourceQualifier #238

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2024
Merged

fix: fix DataSourceQualifier #238

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2024

Conversation

killagu
Copy link
Contributor

@killagu killagu commented Sep 29, 2024

Checklist
  • npm test passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)
Description of change

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified the function call in the DataSourceQualifier, enhancing clarity and maintainability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the DataSourceQualifier function in the DataSourceQualifier.ts file by removing the type assertion for target.constructor as EggProtoImplClass. The change simplifies the call to QualifierUtil.addInjectQualifier by passing target directly without explicit type casting. This adjustment may influence how the target is interpreted within the addInjectQualifier method.

Changes

File Change Summary
core/dal-decorator/src/decorator/DataSourceQualifier.ts Removed type assertion for target.constructor in addInjectQualifier call.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: generate index name with column name #230: Involves modifications to the IndexModel class and its method build, which may relate to how data sources are qualified and indexed, potentially impacting the functionality of the DataSourceQualifier function in the main PR.

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
A type was casted far away.
With simpler calls, we hop along,
In data streams, we sing our song.
A joyful leap, a cleaner way,
Let's celebrate this code today! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 081b4eb and 10846b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • core/dal-decorator/src/decorator/DataSourceQualifier.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
core/dal-decorator/src/decorator/DataSourceQualifier.ts (1)

1-8: Address PR checklist and provide more context

While the change appears to address the DataSourceQualifier issue mentioned in the PR title, I noticed that none of the PR checklist items have been marked as completed. To ensure a thorough review and smooth integration, please address the following:

  1. Confirm that npm test passes with this change.
  2. If applicable, add or update tests related to this fix.
  3. Update documentation if this change affects any public APIs or behaviors.
  4. Ensure your commit message follows the project's commit guidelines.

Additionally, it would be helpful if you could provide more context about the specific issue this PR is addressing. What problem was occurring with DataSourceQualifier, and how does this change resolve it?

To help verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for tests related to DataSourceQualifier and run them

# Test 1: Find test files related to DataSourceQualifier
echo "Searching for DataSourceQualifier test files:"
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts | xargs rg 'DataSourceQualifier'

# Test 2: Run npm test (if available)
if [ -f "package.json" ] && jq -e '.scripts.test' package.json > /dev/null; then
  echo "Running npm test:"
  npm test
else
  echo "npm test script not found in package.json"
fi

This script will help identify relevant test files and attempt to run the test suite. Please review the results and ensure that appropriate tests are in place for this change.

@killagu killagu merged commit 7b1ebe7 into master Sep 29, 2024
12 checks passed
@killagu killagu deleted the fix/DataSourceQualifier branch September 29, 2024 07:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant