Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix aop in constructor inject type #247

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

killagu
Copy link
Contributor

@killagu killagu commented Oct 10, 2024

Checklist
  • npm test passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)
Description of change

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced AOP functionality with new hooks and advice injection methods.
    • Introduced a new module for constructor injection in AOP, improving dependency management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved sequence of operations in module loading to ensure proper graph building.
  • Tests

    • Added a new test suite for constructor injection, increasing test coverage for AOP functionality.
  • Documentation

    • New package.json file created for the "aop-module" to define module configuration.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily enhance the Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP) capabilities within the application. Key modifications include the addition of a new method, injectAdvice, in the EggObjectAopHook class to facilitate advice injection based on an aspect list. New test cases have been introduced to validate constructor injection functionality. Additionally, several files have been updated to incorporate new imports and register hooks with the GlobalGraph, ensuring a more robust AOP framework.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
core/aop-runtime/src/EggObjectAopHook.ts Added injectAdvice method; updated postCreate to call injectAdvice.
core/aop-runtime/test/aop-runtime.test.ts Added a test suite for constructor injection in AOP, including two tests using HelloConstructorInject.
core/aop-runtime/test/fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/Hello.ts Introduced Foo and HelloConstructorInject classes with AOP decorators; added two async methods.
core/aop-runtime/test/fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/package.json Created new package.json for the "aop-module" with module configuration.
plugin/aop/app.ts Updated to import and register crossCutGraphHook, pointCutGraphHook, and GlobalGraph.
plugin/tegg/lib/EggModuleLoader.ts Replaced this.buildAppGraph() with this.globalGraph.build() in loadModule.
standalone/standalone/src/EggModuleLoader.ts Added this.globalGraph.build() call in load method for module configuration processing.
standalone/standalone/src/Runner.ts Updated imports; registered crossCutGraphHook and pointCutGraphHook with GlobalGraph.

Possibly related PRs

🐰 In the garden of code, I hop and play,
With hooks and advice, we brighten the day.
A sprinkle of tests, for constructors we cheer,
AOP magic unfolds, let’s spread the good cheer!
With graphs intertwined, our modules align,
In this coding wonder, everything's fine! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
plugin/aop/app.ts (1)

34-35: Approve changes with a suggestion for safer GlobalGraph access.

The addition of crossCutGraphHook and pointCutGraphHook to GlobalGraph.instance enhances the AOP capabilities of the application. However, the use of the non-null assertion operator (!) might lead to runtime errors if GlobalGraph.instance is null or undefined.

Consider adding a null check or using optional chaining for safer access:

if (GlobalGraph.instance) {
  GlobalGraph.instance.registerBuildHook(crossCutGraphHook);
  GlobalGraph.instance.registerBuildHook(pointCutGraphHook);
} else {
  // Handle the case where GlobalGraph.instance is null or undefined
  console.warn('GlobalGraph.instance is not available');
}

Or using optional chaining:

GlobalGraph.instance?.registerBuildHook(crossCutGraphHook);
GlobalGraph.instance?.registerBuildHook(pointCutGraphHook);

This approach would make the code more robust and prevent potential runtime errors.

core/aop-runtime/src/EggObjectAopHook.ts (1)

17-18: Clarify comments for better readability

The comments at lines 17~ and 18~ contain grammatical errors and might be unclear to readers. Consider rephrasing them to enhance clarity and understanding.

Suggested rephrasing:

-// constructor inject only paas obj to constructor
-// should manually define obj to property
+// For constructor injection, the injected object is only passed to the constructor.
+// We need to manually define the advice objects as properties on the instance.
core/aop-runtime/test/aop-runtime.test.ts (1)

202-247: Remove Unnecessary console.log Statement in Test

The console.log('msg: ', msg, traceMsg); statement on line 208 is primarily used for debugging purposes. Leaving console statements in committed test code can clutter test outputs and is not recommended in production code.

Suggested Change:

            // Remove the console.log statement
-            console.log('msg: ', msg, traceMsg);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ae42093 and 3fb1ccb.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • core/aop-runtime/src/EggObjectAopHook.ts (3 hunks)
  • core/aop-runtime/test/aop-runtime.test.ts (2 hunks)
  • core/aop-runtime/test/fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/Hello.ts (1 hunks)
  • core/aop-runtime/test/fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/package.json (1 hunks)
  • plugin/aop/app.ts (2 hunks)
  • plugin/tegg/lib/EggModuleLoader.ts (1 hunks)
  • standalone/standalone/src/EggModuleLoader.ts (1 hunks)
  • standalone/standalone/src/Runner.ts (3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • core/aop-runtime/test/fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (16)
plugin/tegg/lib/EggModuleLoader.ts (1)

47-48: Approved changes, but clarification needed on sort() method

The changes look good and potentially improve performance by avoiding rebuilding the entire graph each time loadModule() is called. However, I have a few points to address:

  1. Can you provide more information about the sort() method of globalGraph? Understanding its purpose and impact would be helpful.
  2. Consider updating the class documentation to reflect that the graph is now built once in the constructor and updated in loadModule().
  3. It might be worth adding a comment explaining why sorting the graph is necessary at this point in the code.

To verify the impact of these changes, let's check how GlobalGraph is used elsewhere in the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Approved changes with verification

The changes have been verified and the usage of the sort() method in globalGraph is appropriate and confined to the intended areas within EggModuleLoader.ts. No further issues were found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of GlobalGraph in the codebase

# Search for GlobalGraph usage
echo "GlobalGraph usage:"
rg --type typescript "GlobalGraph" -A 5

# Search for sort method calls on GlobalGraph
echo "\nGlobalGraph sort method usage:"
rg --type typescript "globalGraph\.sort\(\)" -A 5

Length of output: 283


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of GlobalGraph in TypeScript (.ts) files

# Search for GlobalGraph usage in .ts files
echo "GlobalGraph usage in .ts files:"
rg "GlobalGraph" -g "*.ts" -A 5

# Search for sort method calls on globalGraph in .ts files
echo "\nglobalGraph.sort() method usage in .ts files:"
rg "globalGraph\.sort\(\)" -g "*.ts" -A 5

Length of output: 32223

plugin/aop/app.ts (3)

3-9: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized and relevant.

The new imports for crossCutGraphHook, pointCutGraphHook, and GlobalGraph are appropriately added and grouped with related imports. This change enhances the AOP functionality of the application and improves code organization.

Also applies to: 11-11


Line range hint 1-52: Summary: AOP enhancements well-integrated, minor improvements suggested.

Overall, the changes to plugin/aop/app.ts enhance the AOP capabilities of the application by introducing new graph hooks (crossCutGraphHook and pointCutGraphHook) and registering them with the global graph. The modifications are well-integrated and consistent with the file's purpose.

Key points:

  1. Import statements are appropriately updated and organized.
  2. New hooks are registered in the configDidLoad method.
  3. The overall structure of the AopAppHook class remains consistent.

Suggestions for improvement:

  1. Consider adding null checks when accessing GlobalGraph.instance.
  2. Update documentation to explain the purpose and impact of the new hooks.

These changes appear to be a positive enhancement to the AOP system. Once the minor suggestions are addressed, this code should be ready for merging.


3-9: Request for additional context and documentation updates.

The introduction of crossCutGraphHook and pointCutGraphHook appears to enhance the AOP capabilities of the application. However, the full impact of these changes on the rest of the application is not immediately clear from this file alone.

Could you provide more context on how these new hooks are used in other parts of the application? This information would help in assessing the overall impact of these changes.

Additionally, consider updating the documentation to reflect these new AOP enhancements. This could include:

  1. A brief explanation of the purpose of crossCutGraphHook and pointCutGraphHook.
  2. How these hooks interact with the rest of the AOP system.
  3. Any potential performance implications or considerations for developers using these new hooks.

To help understand the usage of these new hooks, we can search for their occurrences in the codebase:

This will help identify other files that might need to be updated or reviewed in light of these changes.

Also applies to: 11-11, 34-35

✅ Verification successful

AOP Hooks Integration Verified Successfully.

The imports of crossCutGraphHook and pointCutGraphHook in plugin/aop/app.ts are utilized across multiple parts of the application, including:

  • standalone/standalone/src/Runner.ts
  • core/aop-runtime/test/aop-runtime.test.ts
  • core/aop-runtime/src/CrossCutGraphHook.ts
  • core/aop-runtime/src/PointCutGraphHook.ts

This confirms that the introduction of these hooks enhances the AOP capabilities as intended without disrupting existing functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of crossCutGraphHook and pointCutGraphHook
echo "Occurrences of crossCutGraphHook:"
rg --type typescript "crossCutGraphHook"

echo "\nOccurrences of pointCutGraphHook:"
rg --type typescript "pointCutGraphHook"

Length of output: 309


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of crossCutGraphHook and pointCutGraphHook in TypeScript files
echo "Occurrences of crossCutGraphHook:"
rg "crossCutGraphHook" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"

echo "\nOccurrences of pointCutGraphHook:"
rg "pointCutGraphHook" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"

Length of output: 1510

core/aop-runtime/test/fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/Hello.ts (6)

1-3: Import statements are correct and necessary

The import statements correctly include the required decorators and advice classes, ensuring that the aspect-oriented programming and dependency injection functionalities are available.


5-7: Singleton Foo class is properly declared

The Foo class is appropriately annotated with @SingletonProto(), which ensures a single instance of Foo throughout the application.


9-12: HelloConstructorInject class is correctly defined with context scope

The HelloConstructorInject class is annotated with @ContextProto(), indicating it is context-scoped. The id property is initialized correctly.


13-15: Constructor dependency injection is correctly implemented

The constructor properly injects the Foo instance using the @Inject() decorator. Declaring foo as readonly ensures the injected dependency remains immutable after construction.


16-19: hello method correctly applies pointcut advice

The hello method is appropriately decorated with @Pointcut, utilizing PointcutAdvice and pointcutAdviceParams. The method implementation correctly returns a greeting message.


21-24: helloWithException method correctly simulates exception handling with pointcut advice

The helloWithException method is also decorated with @Pointcut and correctly throws an error, which is suitable for testing exception scenarios in aspect-oriented programming.

core/aop-runtime/src/EggObjectAopHook.ts (3)

1-7: Necessary imports are correctly added

The newly added imports at lines 1~, 5~, 6~, and 7~ are appropriate and required for the implementation of the injectAdvice method.


19-34: injectAdvice method is well-implemented

The injectAdvice method is correctly implemented to inject advice objects into the target object when constructor injection is used. The logic ensures that advice objects are properly assigned and made non-enumerable.


50-50: Proper integration of injectAdvice in postCreate method

The calls to injectAdvice at lines 50~ and 57~ appropriately ensure that advice objects are injected after method hijacking. This integration maintains the intended behavior of the AOP framework.

Also applies to: 57-57

standalone/standalone/src/Runner.ts (3)

4-4: Addition of 'GlobalGraph' import is appropriate and necessary

Importing GlobalGraph from @eggjs/tegg-metadata is needed for registering build hooks later in the code.


29-34: Appropriate addition of AOP-related imports from '@eggjs/tegg-aop-runtime'

Importing crossCutGraphHook, pointCutGraphHook, EggObjectAopHook, EggPrototypeCrossCutHook, and LoadUnitAopHook enhances the AOP capabilities of the Runner class.


151-152: Ensure 'GlobalGraph.instance' is initialized before registering build hooks

The use of the non-null assertion operator ! on GlobalGraph.instance assumes it is initialized. To prevent potential runtime errors, verify that GlobalGraph.instance is properly initialized before these calls.

Run the following script to verify the initialization of GlobalGraph.instance:

return globalGraph;
}

async load(): Promise<LoadUnit[]> {
const loadUnits: LoadUnit[] = [];
this.globalGraph.build();
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Multiple globalGraph.build() Calls Lacking Error Handling

The verification identified multiple instances of globalGraph.build() within the codebase that are not surrounded by error handling mechanisms. Specifically:

  • plugin/tegg/lib/EggModuleLoader.ts: this.globalGraph.build();
  • standalone/standalone/src/EggModuleLoader.ts: this.globalGraph.build();

Concerns:

  • Exception Handling: The absence of try/catch blocks around these calls may lead to unhandled exceptions, potentially destabilizing the module loading process.
  • Redundant Builds: Multiple invocations of build() could result in unnecessary performance overhead if not managed correctly.

Recommendations:

  • Implement Error Handling: Wrap each globalGraph.build() call within try/catch blocks to gracefully handle potential exceptions.
  • Review Invocation Frequency: Assess whether multiple build() calls are necessary or if they can be optimized to prevent redundant executions.
🔗 Analysis chain

Ensure graph consistency by building before use.

The addition of this.globalGraph.build() at the beginning of the load method ensures that the graph is properly built before it's sorted and used for creating load units. This change improves the consistency and reliability of the module loading process.

Consider the following points:

  1. This change shifts the responsibility of building the graph from the initial generation phase to the loading phase, which might affect the overall flow of the application.
  2. If load() could potentially be called multiple times, consider adding a check to prevent unnecessary rebuilding of the graph.
  3. Error handling for build() might be beneficial to gracefully handle any exceptions that could occur during the build process.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, please run the following verification:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any other occurrences of globalGraph.build() in the codebase

# Test: Search for other occurrences of globalGraph.build(). Expect: No other occurrences.
rg --type typescript 'globalGraph\.build\(\)'

# Test: Check if there are any error handling mechanisms for build(). Expect: Some form of error handling.
rg --type typescript 'globalGraph\.build\(\).*try|catch'

Length of output: 176


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any other occurrences of globalGraph.build() in the codebase

# Test: Search for other occurrences of globalGraph.build(). Expect: No other occurrences.
rg --type ts 'globalGraph\.build\(\)'

# Test: Check if there are any error handling mechanisms for build(). Expect: Some form of error handling.
rg --type ts 'globalGraph\.build\(\).*try|catch'

Length of output: 2409

Comment on lines +165 to +200
describe('aop constructor should work', () => {
let modules: Array<LoadUnitInstance>;
let crosscutAdviceFactory: CrosscutAdviceFactory;
let eggObjectAopHook: EggObjectAopHook;
let loadUnitAopHook: LoadUnitAopHook;
let eggPrototypeCrossCutHook: EggPrototypeCrossCutHook;

beforeEach(async () => {
crosscutAdviceFactory = new CrosscutAdviceFactory();
eggObjectAopHook = new EggObjectAopHook();
loadUnitAopHook = new LoadUnitAopHook(crosscutAdviceFactory);
eggPrototypeCrossCutHook = new EggPrototypeCrossCutHook(crosscutAdviceFactory);
EggPrototypeLifecycleUtil.registerLifecycle(eggPrototypeCrossCutHook);
LoadUnitLifecycleUtil.registerLifecycle(loadUnitAopHook);
EggObjectLifecycleUtil.registerLifecycle(eggObjectAopHook);

modules = await CoreTestHelper.prepareModules([
path.join(__dirname, '..'),
path.join(__dirname, 'fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop'),
path.join(__dirname, 'fixtures/modules/hello_point_cut'),
path.join(__dirname, 'fixtures/modules/hello_cross_cut'),
], [
crossCutGraphHook,
pointCutGraphHook,
]);
});

afterEach(async () => {
for (const module of modules) {
await LoadUnitFactory.destroyLoadUnit(module.loadUnit);
await LoadUnitInstanceFactory.destroyLoadUnitInstance(module);
}
EggPrototypeLifecycleUtil.deleteLifecycle(eggPrototypeCrossCutHook);
LoadUnitLifecycleUtil.deleteLifecycle(loadUnitAopHook);
EggObjectLifecycleUtil.deleteLifecycle(eggObjectAopHook);
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Refactor to Eliminate Redundant beforeEach and afterEach Blocks

The beforeEach and afterEach blocks in this test suite are nearly identical to those in the previous suites. To enhance maintainability and reduce code duplication, consider abstracting the shared setup and teardown logic into reusable helper functions or moving them to a higher scope if applicable.

Suggested Refactor:

Create helper functions for setup and teardown:

// Define a type for the setup components
interface TestEnvironmentSetup {
  modules: Array<LoadUnitInstance>;
  crosscutAdviceFactory: CrosscutAdviceFactory;
  eggObjectAopHook: EggObjectAopHook;
  loadUnitAopHook: LoadUnitAopHook;
  eggPrototypeCrossCutHook: EggPrototypeCrossCutHook;
}

// Extract setup logic
async function initializeTestEnvironment(modulePaths: string[]): Promise<TestEnvironmentSetup> {
  const crosscutAdviceFactory = new CrosscutAdviceFactory();
  const eggObjectAopHook = new EggObjectAopHook();
  const loadUnitAopHook = new LoadUnitAopHook(crosscutAdviceFactory);
  const eggPrototypeCrossCutHook = new EggPrototypeCrossCutHook(crosscutAdviceFactory);

  EggPrototypeLifecycleUtil.registerLifecycle(eggPrototypeCrossCutHook);
  LoadUnitLifecycleUtil.registerLifecycle(loadUnitAopHook);
  EggObjectLifecycleUtil.registerLifecycle(eggObjectAopHook);

  const modules = await CoreTestHelper.prepareModules(modulePaths, [
    crossCutGraphHook,
    pointCutGraphHook,
  ]);

  return {
    modules,
    crosscutAdviceFactory,
    eggObjectAopHook,
    loadUnitAopHook,
    eggPrototypeCrossCutHook,
  };
}

// Extract teardown logic
async function cleanupTestEnvironment(setup: TestEnvironmentSetup): Promise<void> {
  for (const module of setup.modules) {
    await LoadUnitFactory.destroyLoadUnit(module.loadUnit);
    await LoadUnitInstanceFactory.destroyLoadUnitInstance(module);
  }
  EggPrototypeLifecycleUtil.deleteLifecycle(setup.eggPrototypeCrossCutHook);
  LoadUnitLifecycleUtil.deleteLifecycle(setup.loadUnitAopHook);
  EggObjectLifecycleUtil.deleteLifecycle(setup.eggObjectAopHook);
}

// Use the helper functions in your test suite
let testSetup: TestEnvironmentSetup;

beforeEach(async () => {
  testSetup = await initializeTestEnvironment([
    path.join(__dirname, '..'),
    path.join(__dirname, 'fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop'),
    path.join(__dirname, 'fixtures/modules/hello_point_cut'),
    path.join(__dirname, 'fixtures/modules/hello_cross_cut'),
  ]);
});

afterEach(async () => {
  await cleanupTestEnvironment(testSetup);
});

This refactor promotes code reuse and simplifies future maintenance.

Comment on lines +253 to +255
mm(HelloConstructorInject.prototype, 'hello', async () => {
helloMocked = true;
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid Mocking Prototypes Directly

Mocking methods on the prototype directly using mm(HelloConstructorInject.prototype, 'hello', ...) can have unintended side effects on other tests that rely on HelloConstructorInject. It's better to mock the method on the instance to ensure test isolation.

Suggested Modification:

            let helloMocked = false;
-            mm(HelloConstructorInject.prototype, 'hello', async () => {
+            mm(hello, 'hello', async () => {
              helloMocked = true;
            });

By mocking the hello method on the hello instance, you limit the scope of the mock to this test case.

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
import { crossCutGraphHook } from '../src/CrossCutGraphHook';
import { pointCutGraphHook } from '../src/PointCutGraphHook';
import { CallTrace } from './fixtures/modules/hello_cross_cut/CallTrace';
import { HelloConstructorInject } from './fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/Hello';
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Import Path Incorrect: HelloConstructorInject Not Exported from Specified Module

The module './fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/Hello' does not export HelloConstructorInject. Please verify that HelloConstructorInject is correctly exported in core/aop-runtime/test/fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/Hello.ts or update the import path to point to the correct module exporting HelloConstructorInject.

  • File to Verify:
    • core/aop-runtime/test/fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/Hello.ts
🔗 Analysis chain

Import Path Verification for HelloConstructorInject

Please verify that the import path './fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/Hello' correctly leads to a module exporting HelloConstructorInject. This ensures that the module is correctly resolved at runtime and prevents potential import errors.

Run the following script to confirm the export:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if 'HelloConstructorInject' is exported from the specified module.

# Test: Search for the export statement of 'HelloConstructorInject'. Expect: Export declaration to be present.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export class HelloConstructorInject { $$$ }' './fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/Hello.ts'

Length of output: 233


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for files named 'Hello.ts' in the repository to verify their existence and paths.

fd 'Hello\.ts$' --type f

Length of output: 2768


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if 'HelloConstructorInject' is exported from the correct 'Hello.ts' module.

# Test: Search for the export statement of 'HelloConstructorInject'. Expect: Export declaration to be present.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export class HelloConstructorInject { $$$ }' 'core/aop-runtime/test/fixtures/modules/constructor_inject_aop/Hello.ts'

Length of output: 155


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search the entire repository for the export of 'HelloConstructorInject'.

# Test: Look for any export statements of 'HelloConstructorInject' across all TypeScript files.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export (class|const|function|interface) HelloConstructorInject { $$$ }' '**/*.ts'

Length of output: 176

@killagu killagu merged commit d169bb2 into master Oct 10, 2024
12 checks passed
@killagu killagu deleted the fix/aop_constructor_inject branch October 10, 2024 07:21
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2024
4 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2024
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant