Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade werkzeug from 0.15.6 to 3.0.6 #220

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ekmixon
Copy link
Owner

@ekmixon ekmixon commented Oct 29, 2024

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning
Flask 1.1.1 requires Werkzeug, which is not installed.

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Directory Traversal
🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 29, 2024

🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request!


Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Micro-Learning Topic: Directory traversal (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Directory Traversal"

What is this? (2min video)

Path traversal vulnerabilities occur when inputs that have not been sufficiently validated or sanitised are used to build directory or file paths. If an attacker can influence the path being accessed by the server, they may be able to gain unauthorised access to files or even execute arbitrary code on the server (when coupled with file upload functionality).

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Helpful references
  • OWASP Input Validation Cheat Sheet - This cheatsheet is focused on providing clear, simple, actionable guidance for preventing injection and input validation flaws in your applications, including defence against path traversal.
  • OWASP Path Traversal - OWASP community page with comprehensive information about path traversal, and links to various OWASP resources to help detect or prevent it.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:

  • It seems to have been created by a bot ('[Snyk]' found in title). We assume it knows what it's doing!
  • We don't review packaging changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants