Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.x] TBS: Add sampling.tail.discard_on_write_failure config (backport #15159) #15170

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Motivation/summary

Add config sampling.tail.discard_on_write_failure (default=false) for users to opt in to data loss when TBS storage limit is reached, as an escape hatch when increased ES indexing load is unacceptable.

Checklist

- [ ] Update CHANGELOG.asciidoc backported
- [ ] Documentation has been updated intentionally undocumented

For functional changes, consider:

  • Is it observable through the addition of either logging or metrics?
  • Is its use being published in telemetry to enable product improvement?
  • Have system tests been added to avoid regression?

How to test these changes

Enable TBS, trigger storage limit reached, check if behavior aligns with config = {true, false}

Related issues

Fixes #11127


This is an automatic backport of pull request #15159 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

Add config sampling.tail.discard_on_write_failure (default=false) for users to opt in to data loss when TBS storage limit is reached, as an escape hatch when increased ES indexing load is unacceptable.

(cherry picked from commit 9b40574)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 7, 2025 22:22
@mergify mergify bot added the backport label Jan 7, 2025
@mergify mergify bot merged commit f802f9b into 8.x Jan 7, 2025
13 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/8.x/pr-15159 branch January 7, 2025 23:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant