Skip to content

Conversation

@susan-shu-c
Copy link
Member

@susan-shu-c susan-shu-c commented Dec 26, 2025

Proposed commit message

Add additional fields to beaconing and fix alert issues

Checklist

  • I have reviewed tips for building integrations and this pull request is aligned with them.
  • I have verified that all data streams collect metrics or logs.
  • I have added an entry to my package's changelog.yml file.
  • I have verified that Kibana version constraints are current according to guidelines.
  • I have verified that any added dashboard complies with Kibana's Dashboard good practices

How to test this PR locally

(In the beaconing directory)

elastic-package install

Related issues

Screenshots

@susan-shu-c susan-shu-c changed the title Add additional fields to beaconing and fix alert issues [WIP] Add additional fields to beaconing and fix alert issues Dec 26, 2025
@susan-shu-c susan-shu-c changed the title [WIP] Add additional fields to beaconing and fix alert issues Add additional fields to beaconing and fix alert issues Jan 7, 2026
@susan-shu-c susan-shu-c marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2026 21:32
@susan-shu-c susan-shu-c requested a review from a team as a code owner January 7, 2026 21:32
@andrewkroh andrewkroh added Integration:beaconing Network Beaconing Identification Team:Security-Applied ML Elastic Security Protections Machine Learning (ML) team [elastic/sec-applied-ml] labels Jan 8, 2026
@elasticmachine
Copy link

Pinging @elastic/sec-applied-ml (Team:Security-Applied ML)

@sodhikirti07
Copy link
Contributor

@elastic/kibana-management Can someone from your team review the transform changes? I mentioned @alisonelizabeth that we’ll add your team as CODEOWNERS and attempted to add the team to the CODEOWNERS file, but it seems the team doesn’t currently have write access to this repository, so we’re unable to add it at this time.

field: "@timestamp"
_meta:
fleet_transform_version: 1.2.4
fleet_transform_version: 1.3.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is so confusing and difficult to maintain.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's true... I followed semantic versioning like the package version, the package version was bumped a minor version 1.3.3 -> 1.4.0 so I bumped it here too in the same manner 1.2.4 -> 1.3.0 instead of to 1.2.5, but either way it's really confusing 😔

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we change it to 1.4.0 to match the destination index? Tbh, it can cause confusion as ideally you'd want your transform version to match your index.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point, might as well - updated!

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But noting that previously the fleet transform version 1.2.4 (previous) doesn't match the destination index 1.3.3 (previous); rather, the destination index 1.3.3 matches the package version 1.3.3, while the fleet transform version was independent

@susan-shu-c susan-shu-c force-pushed the add-beaconing-fields branch from bb1602d to 426d9d0 Compare January 8, 2026 19:35
@susan-shu-c susan-shu-c force-pushed the add-beaconing-fields branch from 426d9d0 to 703c730 Compare January 8, 2026 19:36
@elasticmachine
Copy link

💚 Build Succeeded

History

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Integration:beaconing Network Beaconing Identification Team:Security-Applied ML Elastic Security Protections Machine Learning (ML) team [elastic/sec-applied-ml]

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants