-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 525
Add additional fields to beaconing and fix alert issues #16706
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Pinging @elastic/sec-applied-ml (Team:Security-Applied ML) |
|
@elastic/kibana-management Can someone from your team review the transform changes? I mentioned @alisonelizabeth that we’ll add your team as CODEOWNERS and attempted to add the team to the CODEOWNERS file, but it seems the team doesn’t currently have write access to this repository, so we’re unable to add it at this time. |
| field: "@timestamp" | ||
| _meta: | ||
| fleet_transform_version: 1.2.4 | ||
| fleet_transform_version: 1.3.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is so confusing and difficult to maintain.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's true... I followed semantic versioning like the package version, the package version was bumped a minor version 1.3.3 -> 1.4.0 so I bumped it here too in the same manner 1.2.4 -> 1.3.0 instead of to 1.2.5, but either way it's really confusing 😔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we change it to 1.4.0 to match the destination index? Tbh, it can cause confusion as ideally you'd want your transform version to match your index.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, might as well - updated!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But noting that previously the fleet transform version 1.2.4 (previous) doesn't match the destination index 1.3.3 (previous); rather, the destination index 1.3.3 matches the package version 1.3.3, while the fleet transform version was independent
bb1602d to
426d9d0
Compare
426d9d0 to
703c730
Compare
💚 Build Succeeded
History
|
Proposed commit message
Add additional fields to beaconing and fix alert issues
Checklist
changelog.ymlfile.How to test this PR locally
(In the beaconing directory)
Related issues
Screenshots