-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
Don't show 'waiting for media' on connected participants #3626
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
robintown
wants to merge
11
commits into
element-hq:livekit
Choose a base branch
from
robintown:non-publishing-participants
base: livekit
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Don't show 'waiting for media' on connected participants #3626
robintown
wants to merge
11
commits into
element-hq:livekit
from
robintown:non-publishing-participants
+490
−442
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
They had loose types that were allowing them also output local members. They don't do this, it's just misleading.
By tagging participant behaviors with a type (local vs. remote) we can now tell what kind of participant it will be in a completely type-safe manner.
The doc comment here was about to become stale, so let's just remove it.
We would show 'waiting for media' on participants that were connected but had no published tracks, because we were filtering them out of the remote participants list on connections. I believe this was done in an attempt to limit our view to only the participants that have a matching MatrixRTC membership. But that's fully redundant to the "Matrix-LiveKit members" module, which actually has the right information to do this (the MatrixRTC memberships).
On second glance, the way that we determined a media tile to be 'waiting for media' was too implicit for my taste. It would appear on a surface reading to depend on whether a participant was currently publishing any video. But in reality, the 'video' object was always defined as long as a LiveKit participant existed, so in reality it depended on just the participant. We should show this relationship more explicitly by moving the computation into the view model, where it can depend on the participant directly.
We don't expect them to be publishing on any transport; they might be a subscribe-only bot.
There's no reason to allow it to take on placeholder values. It should be defined when the media has a published video track and undefined when not.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
PR-Bug-Fix
Release note category. A PR that fixes a bug.
X-Blocked
Cannot be merged due to external dependencies
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We would show 'waiting for media' on participants that were connected but had no published tracks, because we were filtering them out of the remote participants list on connections. I believe this was done in an attempt to limit our view to only the participants that have a matching MatrixRTC membership. But that's fully redundant to the "Matrix-LiveKit members" module, which actually has the right information to do this (the MatrixRTC memberships).
After fixing that, I tried to improve some things that had been entangled. The commits have all the details.
Closes #3627