-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added: lsp-haskell-execute-code-action-add-signature #129
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
added: lsp-haskell-execute-code-action-add-signature #129
Conversation
I want it to be a stand-alone function because I often do this in Haskell code actions. I update Package-Requires emacs `24.3` -> `26.1`, because `seq-find` require Emacs 25, lsp-mode of base package require `26.1`, Since lsp-haskell will never work without lsp-mode, there is no point in lsp-haskell supporting old Emacs that lsp-mode does not support.
lsp-haskell.el
Outdated
"Execute code action of add signature. | ||
Add the type signature that GHC infers to the function located below the point." | ||
(interactive) | ||
(let ((action (seq-find (lambda (e) (string-prefix-p "add signature" (gethash "title" e))) (lsp-code-actions-at-point)))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you should not use gethash because when lsp-use-plists is t the data structures will be plists. You may refer to lsp-execute-code-action-by-kind
in lsp-java.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant lsp-java-execute-matching-action
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or we want the stuff in emacs-lsp/lsp-mode#2402
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
HLS should set an identifiable kind for the action for this reason. If it doesn't please open a PR upstream so that it does. See also #112
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thank.
I use lsp:code-action-title
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code action titles aren't the same as kinds! Titles are user facing strings that can change at any time, kinds should be more stable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In fact, possibly what you want is this: https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode/blob/master/lsp-mode.el#L5520
Compare with: https://github.com/haskell/haskell-language-server/pull/1988/files
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, lsp-java is using the title because the server is refusing to fix the kinds.
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||
;;; lsp-haskell.el --- Haskell support for lsp-mode | |||
|
|||
;; Version: 1.0 | |||
;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "24.3") (lsp-mode "3.0") (haskell-mode "1.0")) | |||
;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "26.1") (lsp-mode "3.0") (haskell-mode "1.0")) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
I followed the code review. > you should not use gethash because when lsp-use-plists is t the data structures will be plists. You may refer to lsp-execute-code-action-by-kind in lsp-java. > > <emacs-lsp#129 (comment)>
[added: lsp-haskell-execute-code-action-add-signature by ncaq · Pull Request #129 · emacs-lsp/lsp-haskell](emacs-lsp/lsp-haskell#129)
Seems everything in the thread was addressed. Love providing type signatures for local functions, this would help type programming immensely. |
I want it to be a stand-alone function because I often do this in Haskell code actions.
I update Package-Requires emacs
24.3
->26.1
,because
seq-find
require Emacs 25,lsp-mode of base package require
26.1
,Since lsp-haskell will never work without lsp-mode,
there is no point in lsp-haskell supporting old Emacs that lsp-mode does not support.