Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency concurrently to v9 #1249

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 8, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
concurrently 8.2.2 -> 9.1.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

open-cli-tools/concurrently (concurrently)

v9.1.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: open-cli-tools/concurrently@v9.0.1...v9.1.0

v9.0.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: open-cli-tools/concurrently@v9.0.0...v9.0.1

v9.0.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/concurrently-9.x branch from e799f40 to 477d526 Compare September 12, 2024 03:37
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/concurrently-9.x branch from 477d526 to b6d610d Compare October 12, 2024 22:09
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/concurrently-9.x branch from b6d610d to b65a4ae Compare November 4, 2024 13:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants