Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BREAKING?] fix(settled, waitUntil): reject with error thrown in run loop #1194

Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

buschtoens
Copy link
Contributor

@buschtoens buschtoens commented Feb 24, 2022

This PR is currently still WIP and failing some tests, but I'd like to receive feedback on the implementation and course-correct, where necessary.


The goal of this PR is to fix the longstanding issue of test helpers not propagating run loop errors thrown during their execution, but instead causing an out of band "global failure" that fails the test. For example:

test('`render` rejects with error thrown inside the run loop', async function (assert) {
  // 🔥 BUG: `render` doesn't reject, instead we get an uncatchable "global failure".
  await assert.rejects(
    render(hbs`<UnknownComponent />`),
    /unknown-component/
  );
});
test('`click` rejects with run loop errors', async function (assert) {
  this.owner.register('component:click-test', Component.extend({
    layout: hbs`<div class="click-test"></div>`,

    click() {
      later(() => {
        throw new Error('bazinga');
      }, 10);
    },
  }));

  await render(hbs`<ClickTest />`);

  // 🔥 BUG: `click` doesn't reject, instead we get an uncatchable "global failure".
  await assert.rejects(
    click('.click-test'),
    /bazinga/,
    'rejects with the error thrown inside the run loop'
  );
});

Fixes #310. Fixes #453. Relates to #440, #1128, ember-qunit#592


This PR adds an rejectOnError option to waitUntil. It defaults to true, if the test context is set up correctly for use with setupOnerror.

If enabled, waitUntil will reject when an error propagates to Ember.onerror, using setupOnerror under the hood. As such, (a/sync) errors thrown in a run loop will cause waitUntil to fail.

Almost all test helpers end with a call to settled, which just calls waitUntil. Therefore they'll all automatically benefit from this change and reject, if an error is thrown during their execution.

I've written down an in-depth analysis of the flow in this #1128 comment.

Comment on lines +16 to +25
/**
* Instrument `Ember.onerror` and reject, when it is called. This is useful
* for detecting that an operation inside a run loop has failed.
*
* This uses {@link setupOnerror}, so it will override any error listeners you
* might have set up before.
*
* @default true if the test context has been setup for usage with {@link setupOnerror}
*/
rejectOnError?: boolean;
Copy link
Contributor Author

@buschtoens buschtoens Feb 24, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not really fond of this, because:

it will override any error listeners you might have set up before.

@default true if the test context has been setup for usage with setupOnerror

This limitation arises from how setupOnerror works internally. Alternatively, we could always instrument Ember.onerror in tests, somewhat like:

const originalOnError = Ember.onerror;
let onErrorOverride?: typeof Ember.onerror;

Ember.onerror = error => {
  // _Always_ let `waitUntil` know about the error.
  notifyInternalOnError(error);

  // If the user called `setupOnerror(...)`, call the override.
  if (onErrorOverride)
    return onErrorOverride(error);
  
  // Otherwise call the original `Ember.onerror`.
  return originalOnError?.(error);
};

export function setupOnerror(onError?: typeof Ember.onerror): void {
  let context = getContext();

  if (!context) {
    throw new Error('Must setup test context before calling setupOnerror');
  }

  if (!cachedOnerror.has(context)) {
    throw new Error(
      '_cacheOriginalOnerror must be called before setupOnerror. Normally, this will happen as part of your test harness.'
    );
  }

  if (typeof onError !== 'function') {
    onError = cachedOnerror.get(context);
  }

  onErrorOverride = onError;
}

export function resetOnerror(): void {
  let context = getContext();
  if (context && cachedOnerror.has(context)) {
    onErrorOverride = cachedOnerror.get(context);
  }
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

@buschtoens buschtoens Feb 24, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, letting rejectOnError default to true will inevitably break a lot of existing test suites, that currently try to emulate this missing feature by using setupOnerror or manually hooking into Ember.onerror.

However, I believe that ultimately the behavior implemented in this PR is what a user would expect. So while this breaking change may be a pain, because it will require changing all tests dealing with such errors, I think that it's a very welcome change.

Maybe we could even conjur up a codemod to ease the transition. Or we could add a compatibility mode, that will essentially change the order of notifyInternalOnError and onErrorOverride, so that "old" tests just continue to work.

const originalOnError = Ember.onerror;
let onErrorOverride?: typeof Ember.onerror;
let preferOnErrorOverride = true;

Ember.onerror = error => {
  // Compatibility mode for old tests.
  if (preferOnErrorOverride && onErrorOverride)
    return onErrorOverride(error);

  // _Always_ let `waitUntil` know about the error.
  notifyInternalOnError(error);

  // If the user called `setupOnerror(...)`, call the override.
  if (onErrorOverride)
    return onErrorOverride(error);
  
  // Otherwise call the original `Ember.onerror`.
  return originalOnError?.(error);
};

We should also consider adding a setter trap for Ember.onerror to catch users manually overriding it in tests.

A second next argument provided to onErrorOverride, like with registerWarnHandler would also be nice:

const originalOnError = Ember.onerror;
let onErrorOverride?: typeof Ember.onerror;

function next() {
  notifyInternalOnError(error);
  return originalOnError?.(error);
}

Ember.onerror = error => {
  if (onErrorOverride)
    return onErrorOverride(error, next);

  return next();
};

@ef4
Copy link
Contributor

ef4 commented Feb 24, 2022

This seems good. I think it's the best solution that doesn't require changes to ember itself.

But I view this as a workaround for a feature ember itself should offer. There should be public API that lets you implement render, and it should include more specific error handling than a single global callback.

@jkeen
Copy link

jkeen commented Sep 2, 2022

Is there any movement on this, or perhaps an alternative available pattern?

I'm currently using this asyncThrows helper via ember-custom-assertions (https://gist.github.com/samselikoff/ad5e3695383b91599ee428bf9a2d22ca) but in trying to upgrade some apps, importing Ember is no longer allowed so it's not working.

It'd be great to get some official pattern for handling testing async render errors!

@NullVoxPopuli
Copy link
Collaborator

Should we pursue finishing / deciding what to do with this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

render does not reject when rendering fails Only jQuery.click() triggers error caught by assert.throws
4 participants