Skip to content

Conversation

@jdunkerley
Copy link
Member

Pull Request Description

  • Initial Alteryx YXDB reader integration.
  • Fix for running tests inside IntelliJ

Checklist

Please ensure that the following checklist has been satisfied before submitting the PR:

  • The documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • Screenshots/screencasts have been attached, if there are any visual changes. For interactive or animated visual changes, a screencast is preferred.
  • All code follows the
    Scala,
    Java,
    TypeScript,
    and
    Rust
    style guides. In case you are using a language not listed above, follow the Rust style guide.
  • Unit tests have been written where possible.
  • If meaningful changes were made to logic or tests affecting Enso Cloud integration in the libraries,
    or the Snowflake database integration, a run of the Extra Tests has been scheduled.
    • If applicable, it is suggested to paste a link to a successful run of the Extra Tests.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the -libs-API-change-Table Marks a PR that changes the public API of Standard.Table label Jan 12, 2026
@jdunkerley jdunkerley marked this pull request as ready for review January 12, 2026 15:01
Copy link
Collaborator

@hubertp hubertp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test/Table_Tests should document what each resource defines and/or how to get the version that is currently committed to the repo.

@jdunkerley jdunkerley added the CI: Ready to merge This PR is eligible for automatic merge label Jan 12, 2026
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 58325d9 into develop Jan 12, 2026
74 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the wip/jd/yxdb-reader branch January 12, 2026 21:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

-libs-API-change-Table Marks a PR that changes the public API of Standard.Table CI: Ready to merge This PR is eligible for automatic merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants