Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update jsn_sr04t.rst #4440

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update jsn_sr04t.rst #4440

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kamahat
Copy link
Contributor

@kamahat kamahat commented Nov 14, 2024

Add info and exemple to use AJ-SR04M

Description:

Related issue (if applicable): fixes

Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): esphome/esphome#

Checklist:

  • I am merging into next because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.
    or

  • I am merging into current because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.

  • Link added in /index.rst when creating new documents for new components or cookbook.

Add info and exemple to use AJ-SR04M
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Deploy Preview for esphome ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 8eaa22a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/esphome/deploys/6735b00ed7d3b70008d86dca
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4440--esphome.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the documentation for the JSN-SR04T and AJ_SR04M ultrasonic range finders, clarifying their specifications and configuration details. It revises the measurement ranges and expands the configuration instructions for the AJ_SR04M to include five modes with detailed resistor connections. Additionally, the YAML configuration example has been modified to change the platform name, adjust parameters, and introduce new filtering options for measurement accuracy.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/sensor/jsn_sr04t.rst Updated specifications for JSN-SR04T and AJ_SR04M sensors; expanded AJ_SR04M configuration to include five modes; modified YAML configuration parameters including platform name, timeout, update interval, and added filters.

Possibly related PRs

  • update jsn_sr04t page #4238: This PR updates the JSN-SR04T documentation, specifically changing the model option from aj_sr04t to aj_sr04m, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the JSN-SR04T and AJ_SR04M sensors.

Suggested labels

has-parent, next

Suggested reviewers

  • jesserockz
  • nagyrobi

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/sensor/jsn_sr04t.rst (2)

24-24: Fix grammatical error in modes introduction

There's a grammatical error in the modes introduction.

-the AJ_SR04M as 5 modes : 
+The AJ_SR04M has 5 modes:

30-33: Maintain consistent formatting for "Serial Port" mentions

The term "Serial Port" is bolded in some modes but not others. Maintain consistent formatting across all mode descriptions.

-Mode 2: Automatic **Serial Port** mode - (Minimum Power Consumption 2.5mA)
-Mode 3: Lower power **Serial Port** Trigger (Minimum Power Consumption 20uA)
+Mode 2: Automatic Serial Port mode - (Minimum Power Consumption 2.5mA)
+Mode 3: Lower power Serial Port Trigger (Minimum Power Consumption 20uA)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 885f8b6 and 8eaa22a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/sensor/jsn_sr04t.rst (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
components/sensor/jsn_sr04t.rst (1)

Pattern **: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams

🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/sensor/jsn_sr04t.rst (1)

92-93: LGTM: Clear documentation of configuration variables

The documentation for the update_interval configuration variable is clear and properly notes its limitations for different modes.

Comment on lines +73 to +77
echo_pin: ${ultrasonic_rx_pin}
trigger_pin:
number: ${ultrasonic_tx_pin}
echo_pin:
number: ${ultrasonic_rx_pin}
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Nov 14, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove duplicate echo_pin configuration

The echo_pin is configured twice, which could cause confusion. Remove the first occurrence since the second one provides a more detailed configuration.

-        echo_pin: ${ultrasonic_rx_pin} 
         trigger_pin: 
           number: ${ultrasonic_tx_pin}
         echo_pin: 
           number: ${ultrasonic_rx_pin}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
echo_pin: ${ultrasonic_rx_pin}
trigger_pin:
number: ${ultrasonic_tx_pin}
echo_pin:
number: ${ultrasonic_rx_pin}
trigger_pin:
number: ${ultrasonic_tx_pin}
echo_pin:
number: ${ultrasonic_rx_pin}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The bot is right, there is a duplicate entry now.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@frenck, glad to hear that the duplicate entry has been fixed.


If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!

components/sensor/jsn_sr04t.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +73 to +77
echo_pin: ${ultrasonic_rx_pin}
trigger_pin:
number: ${ultrasonic_tx_pin}
echo_pin:
number: ${ultrasonic_rx_pin}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The bot is right, there is a duplicate entry now.

@esphome esphome bot marked this pull request as draft November 15, 2024 16:33
@esphome
Copy link

esphome bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request recently. This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because of that and will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jan 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jan 22, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 24, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants