Skip to content

Add robustness test regression target for 20221 #20684

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Add robustness test regression target for 20221 #20684

wants to merge 4 commits into from
+65 −8

Conversation

henrybear327
Copy link
Contributor

@henrybear327 henrybear327 self-assigned this Sep 16, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: henrybear327
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign spzala for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@henrybear327 henrybear327 marked this pull request as draft September 16, 2025 21:16
@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 69.11%. Comparing base (b7420c5) to head (842cd20).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

⚠️ Current head 842cd20 differs from pull request most recent head ea6b5e4

Please upload reports for the commit ea6b5e4 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

see 16 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #20684      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.20%   69.11%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       34794    34794              
==========================================
- Hits        24078    24048      -30     
- Misses       9320     9353      +33     
+ Partials     1396     1393       -3

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b7420c5...ea6b5e4. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@henrybear327
Copy link
Contributor Author

Currently there is no reproduction for 20221 yet.

@henrybear327 henrybear327 force-pushed the robustness-test-regression-target-20221 branch 9 times, most recently from 64cdeaa to caf0527 Compare September 19, 2025 14:42
@henrybear327 henrybear327 force-pushed the robustness-test-regression-target-20221 branch from caf0527 to 704b0b4 Compare September 19, 2025 14:43
@henrybear327
Fix an issue in robustness test that watch created in the ClientSet is
336739c 
closed wrongly

Signed-off-by: Chun-Hung Tseng <[email protected]>
@henrybear327
Implement robustness test target for 20573
a0744cb 
Reference:
- etcd-io#20349

Signed-off-by: Chun-Hung Tseng <[email protected]>
@henrybear327
Implement robustness test target for 20221
b0dd009 
Reference:
- etcd-io#20221

Signed-off-by: Chun-Hung Tseng <[email protected]>
@henrybear327
Monkey patch
ea6b5e4 
Open watch every time on all nodes

.
@henrybear327 henrybear327 force-pushed the robustness-test-regression-target-20221 branch from 704b0b4 to ea6b5e4 Compare September 19, 2025 20:06
@serathius
Copy link
Member

serathius commented Sep 20, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Can we make ready to review?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@serathius serathius Awaiting requested review from serathius

Assignees

@henrybear327 henrybear327

Labels
area/robustness-testing area/testing do-not-merge/work-in-progress size/M
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@henrybear327 @k8s-ci-robot @serathius