-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 246
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor includability check in forks #890
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Refactor includability check in forks #890
Conversation
Some |
@petertdavies could you take a quick look and state if I'm on the right path? |
@SamWilsn could you review this if you have the time? 🙂 |
I'll do my best! Trying to get #925 merged before we start refactoring in earnest. |
@richardgreg There might be a few more checks that we might have to move to |
Awesome |
bf72ed5
to
b80eb0c
Compare
Hi @gurukamath, I just dealt with some conflicts while performing a rebase. I will get around to adding the checks with your template as soon as possible, but if this PR is okay, I'll appreciate it if you merge it so I don't have to rebase again when I get back to the task 😅 🙏🏾 |
Does anyone know if these changes are still needed? I noticed it was approved two weeks ago but was never merged and now has a lot of conflicts |
|
Ah, sorry about the conflicts. We've removed the |
What was wrong?
Includability checks should be moved from
process_transaction()
tocheck_transaction()
Related to Issue #
Ref #799
How was it fixed?
process_transaction()
tocheck_transaction()
check_transaction
Cute Animal Picture