WIP: Eigenyields migration support #25
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We need to migrate some wstETH tokens from our etherFiRestaker contract so that the operator can be one of our protocol controlled operator contracts instead of the public eigenyields operator. We can't simply undelegate -> redelegate all of the funds controlled by that contract because it would effect APR too much. Instead we plan to slowly unstake smaller amounts from the etherFiRestaker contract and then transfer to a dedicated operator contract which will then restake the funds. Each of the operator contracts is already delegating to themselves by the nature of them being a registered eigenlayer operator. There is a matching PR against the "etherfi-protocol/smart-contracts" repo that adds support to the "EtherFiRestaker" contract.