-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 436
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Recommended background reading to error state KF theory #144
Comments
Hi Niko, Maybeck is definitely a very good reference. In terms of getting the basic understanding of an indirect EKF, you might want to read: "Circumventing dynamic modeling: Evaluation of the error-state kalman filter applied to mobile robot localization". Nikolas Trawny's TR is a good reference for the Indirect Kalman filter for 3D attitude estimation. Once you are done with these you can take a look at Joel's IJRR Camera-IMU-based Localization: Observability Analysis and Consistency Improvement |
Hi Simon, thanks for the recommendations! I ordered myself a copy of the Maybeck; that should make for some good bed-time reading for the coming weeks ;-). I have read "Circumventing dynamic modeling: Evaluation of the error-state kalman filter applied to mobile robot localization" before and it is a good paper to get the general idea behind using indirect Kalman filtering for localization, but doesn't really help with understanding the theory thoroughly. I was aware of "Indirect Kalman Filter for 3D Attitude Estimation" and it is on my list for in-depth review, but I just very recently came across Joan Sola's "Quaternion kinematics for the error-state KF", which claims to fulfil a similar purpose to Trawny's tech-report, but it seems to be a more modern version, taking care in particular to carefully discuss the different quaternion conventions found in current literature and software libraries. So I think I will next work through the Sola, and then check if the Trawny contains anything on top top of that. As for Joel's journal paper, I hadn't yet looked at it. From glancing it over, it seems that it does not cover the basics, but provides a treatment of how to analyse observability and how to ensure that the linearised filter has the same observability properties and thus does not become inconsistent as easily. But AFAICT one could do completely without that extension to start with, albeit presumably with reduced consistency and accuracy. Does that make sense? One more thing, since Joel mentions in that paper that this work is more general than the "MSCKF 2.0" (closed-form error transition matrix computation, orientation error re-parameterization in global coordinates, first-estimate Jacobians, and camera-to-IMU calibration as part of the state) enhancements by Li and Mourikis ("Improving the accuracy of EKF-based visual-inertial odometry" and later "High-precision, consistent EKF-based visual-inertial odometry"), would you agree that Joel's method makes the enhancements described by Li obsolete, or should they be combined? Lastly, so far I have only come across indirect KF for localization in a context where IMU is used for prediction. Do you know if the error state formulation is also common in other cases? |
I know this is an old thread, but I found Jay Farrell's Aided Navigation to be very useful. Though, it is a more application based text. |
I was wondering if someone could suggest reading material for the theoretical background on error state Kalman filters. I can follow most explanations (I think) of the ideas implemented in MSF (some at least at an intuitive level), but what I have trouble with in particular in the works describing MSF are the derivations of the discrete and linearized error state transition and measurement equations.
What I am looking for is
What is referenced for these derivations in @stephanweiss 's thesis seems to be http://www.amazon.de/dp/0124807011/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=1LIBKE0BY45TK&coliid=I363ALQSP5N6BH. Would you recommend that as an entry point? What do others think @simonlynen, @markusachtelik, @burrimi, @ffurrer ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: