-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 238
chore: remove sequencer go.mod #2837
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow CI / buf-check (pull_request).
|
|
Claude finished @julienrbrt's task —— View job Code Review CompleteI've thoroughly reviewed this PR that removes the Executive SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ LGTM with Minor Observations This is a well-executed architectural consolidation that simplifies the module structure. The change is clean, properly documented, and aligns with the project's architectural principles. The sequencer implementation remains intact in the codebase at 1. Code Quality & Architecture✅ Strengths:
📋 Observations:
🔍 Architectural Rationale: The PR description states: "sequencers/single was already depending on ev-node anyway" - this is a key insight. Having a circular dependency situation (sequencer depending on ev-node, but being a separate module) justified this consolidation. This matches the architectural principle from CLAUDE.md: "Components are wired together via dependency injection" and the core package pattern. 2. Error Handling & Resilience✅ No Impact: This PR only removes module boundaries, not implementation code. The sequencer's error handling, recovery mechanisms, and resilience features remain unchanged. 3. Security✅ No Security Concerns:
4. Performance & Resource Efficiency✅ Neutral to Positive Impact:
5. Testing & Reliability✅ Strengths:
6. Documentation & Developer Experience✅ Excellent Documentation Updates: The
📝 Minor Documentation Observations:
7. Specific File-by-File ReviewRELEASE.md (MODIFIED)
apps/evm/single/go.mod (MODIFIED)
apps/grpc/single/go.mod (MODIFIED)
apps/testapp/go.mod (MODIFIED)
go.work.example (MODIFIED)
sequencers/single/go.mod (DELETED)
sequencers/single/go.sum (DELETED)
8. Verification Checklist✅ Completed Checks:
⏳ Pending Verification (CI should confirm):
9. Alignment with Related WorkThe PR description mentions: "this means no go.mod need to be added for the new based sequencers in #2797" ✅ This is architecturally sound: The new 10. RecommendationsRequired Actions: None (PR is ready to merge pending CI)Optional Improvements:
Final VerdictRecommendation: ✅ APPROVE (pending CI) This PR represents a thoughtful architectural improvement that:
The code quality is excellent, security is maintained, and the developer experience is improved through clearer release procedures. Once CI passes, this is ready to merge. CI StatusCurrently running:
|
Summary of ChangesHello @julienrbrt, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the project's module structure by eliminating the standalone Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to simplify the Go module structure by removing the separate go.mod for the sequencer. The changes correctly remove dependencies and update the release documentation for sequencers/single. However, I've identified a potential inconsistency regarding the sequencers/based package, which is removed from the documentation but its module files are not touched in this PR. Please see my detailed comment.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2837 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 64.74% 64.65% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 81 81
Lines 7170 7170
==========================================
- Hits 4642 4636 -6
- Misses 1989 1994 +5
- Partials 539 540 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
we decided to remove the sequencer go.mod, as ev-node can provide directly the sequencer implementation (sequencers/single was already depending on ev-node anyway)
this means no go.mod need to be added for the new based sequencers in #2797