Skip to content

Conversation

@chat26666
Copy link
Collaborator

@chat26666 chat26666 commented Jul 9, 2025


작업 내용

  • 웹소켓 heartbeat 주기 변경

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 개선 사항
    • WebSocket 연결의 안정성을 높이기 위해 STOMP 브로커 릴레이의 하트비트 주기 설정이 추가되었습니다.

@chat26666 chat26666 self-assigned this Jul 9, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Walkthrough

WebSocket의 STOMP 브로커 릴레이 설정에 시스템 하트비트 전송 및 수신 간격(각각 10,000ms, 450,000ms)을 추가하여, 브로커 릴레이와 WebSocket 서버 간 연결 상태 모니터링 빈도를 명시적으로 지정했습니다.

Changes

파일/경로 변경 요약
src/main/java/org/ezcode/codetest/infrastructure/event/config/WebSocketConfig.java STOMP 브로커 릴레이에 하트비트 전송/수신 간격 설정 추가

Possibly related PRs

Poem

토끼가 깡총, 하트비트 뚜벅뚜벅
10초마다 신호를 보내요
7분 반 기다리며 귀를 세워
연결이 살아있나, 토끼는 알아요
STOMP와 함께, 서버도 안심!
🐇💓


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 594fc8b and 395f2a0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/java/org/ezcode/codetest/infrastructure/event/config/WebSocketConfig.java (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: chat26666
PR: ezcode-my/backend#37
File: src/main/java/org/ezcode/codetest/infrastructure/elasticsearch/repository/ProblemElasticsearchRepositoryDsl.java:10-10
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T19:56:27.759Z
Learning: When user chat26666 mentions that code was implemented in a previous PR but explanation was missing, they may submit a follow-up PR just to add documentation/explanation without the actual implementation code.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/java/org/ezcode/codetest/infrastructure/event/config/WebSocketConfig.java (1)

53-54: STOMP 브로커 릴레이 하트비트 설정이 올바르게 구성되었습니다.

시스템 하트비트 간격 설정이 적절하게 추가되었습니다:

  • 송신 간격: 10초 (10,000ms) - 연결 상태 모니터링에 적합한 간격
  • 수신 간격: 7.5분 (450,000ms) - 네트워크 환경에 따라 적절한 타임아웃 설정

비대칭 간격 설정은 일반적인 하트비트 구성 패턴입니다.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@chat26666 chat26666 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 9, 2025
@chat26666 chat26666 merged commit 42c82b5 into dev Jul 9, 2025
2 checks passed
@chat26666 chat26666 deleted the feat/game branch July 9, 2025 02:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants