WIP: gtp_common: attach GTREFCLK_USED to IBUFDS #1638
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Given that, if an IBUFDS is used, the corresponding GTREFCLK on the GTP_COMMON site will be used, it is better to have the feature relative to the IBUFDS site, rather than the GTP_COMMON one. Signed-off-by: Alessandro Comodi <[email protected]>
acomodi
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Given that, if an IBUFDS is used, the corresponding GTREFCLK on the GTP_COMMON site will be used as well, it is more convenient to have the
GTREFCLK_USEDfeature within the corresponding IBUFDS_GTE2 site, as there are no routes to connect to the opposite GTREFCLK port in the GTP_COMMON.E.g.: