Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

071-ppips: In Kintex7, two wires are permanently connected to RIOI_O[01] #2063

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator

@hansfbaier hansfbaier commented Dec 2, 2022

Some nodes, for example RIOI_O0 and RIOI_O1 have multiple uphill pips,
which both seem connected to the same output.
In that case the documentation would suggest to generate a hint in the ppips database file:
https://f4pga.readthedocs.io/projects/prjxray/en/latest/dev_database/common/ppips.html
"The tag hint is used for PIPs that are used by Vivado to tell the router that two logic slice outputs drive the same value, i.e., behave like they are connected as far as the routing process is concerned."

Currently, as suggested by @tmichalak here: https://chipsalliance.slack.com/archives/C033M7FLURZ/p1669982485158029, I generate always for those.

@hansfbaier hansfbaier changed the title 071-ppips: generate hints for nodes with multiple uphill pips WIP 071-ppips: generate hints for nodes with multiple uphill pips Dec 3, 2022
@mithro
Copy link
Contributor

mithro commented Dec 3, 2022

@kgugala - Who should review this?

@mithro
Copy link
Contributor

mithro commented Dec 4, 2022

@kgugala - It seems like we have lost the upload to BuildEventStore in the migration to GitHub Actions?

@hansfbaier hansfbaier changed the title WIP 071-ppips: generate hints for nodes with multiple uphill pips 071-ppips: In Kintex7, two wires are permanently connected to RIOI_O[01] Dec 4, 2022
@hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The red Artix fuzzer seems to be a flicker? Seems totally unrelated...

@tmichalak
Copy link
Contributor

I reran the Artix job. Will inspect the db diffs after it finishes to verify if that helped with the missing bits. @hansfbaier I guess there is still the problem with the switchbox pips instead of ppips, correct?

@hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tmichalak Yes, this only generates the ppips that got missing on Kintex (and are needed by nextpnr).
It does neither generate all ppips nor get rid of any switchbox pips.

@hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tmichalak RapidWright has something promising: http://www.rapidwright.io/javadoc/com/xilinx/rapidwright/device/PseudoPIPHelper.html
We could use this to dump the ppips for each tile type.

@hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hansfbaier commented Dec 6, 2022

@tmichalak I wrote a little python script that uses RapidWright to get the pseudo pips of a tile:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys

import rapidwright
from com.xilinx.rapidwright.device import PseudoPIPHelper, Device
import com.xilinx.rapidwright.device.TileTypeEnum as TileType

part = "xc7k70tfbg676-2"
tiletype = sys.argv[1]
device = Device.getDevice(part)
ppipmap = PseudoPIPHelper.getPseudoPIPMap(device)
tiletype = TileType.valueOf(tiletype)
rioi = ppipmap[tiletype]
ppipnames = [str(ph.getPseudoPIPName()) for ph in list(rioi.values())]
print("\n".join(ppipnames))

running it I get:

$ ./get-ppips.py RIOI                
RIOI.RIOI_OLOGIC0_OQ->RIOI_OLOGIC0_OFB
RIOI.RIOI_ILOGIC0_DDLY->IOI_ILOGIC0_O
RIOI.RIOI_OLOGIC0_TQ->RIOI_OLOGIC0_TFB
RIOI.RIOI_ILOGIC0_D->IOI_ILOGIC0_O
RIOI.IOI_OLOGIC1_D1->RIOI_OLOGIC1_OFB
RIOI.IOI_OLOGIC1_D1->RIOI_OLOGIC1_OQ
RIOI.RIOI_IDELAY1_IDATAIN->RIOI_IDELAY1_DATAOUT
RIOI.IOI_OLOGIC0_T1->RIOI_OLOGIC0_TQ
RIOI.IOI_OLOGIC0_T1->RIOI_OLOGIC0_TFB
RIOI.RIOI_IDELAY0_IDATAIN->RIOI_IDELAY0_DATAOUT
RIOI.IOI_OLOGIC1_T1->RIOI_OLOGIC1_TFB
RIOI.IOI_OLOGIC1_T1->RIOI_OLOGIC1_TQ
RIOI.IOI_OLOGIC0_D1->RIOI_OLOGIC0_OQ
RIOI.IOI_OLOGIC0_D1->RIOI_OLOGIC0_OFB
RIOI.RIOI_ILOGIC1_DDLY->IOI_ILOGIC1_O
RIOI.RIOI_ILOGIC1_D->IOI_ILOGIC1_O
RIOI.RIOI_OLOGIC1_TQ->RIOI_OLOGIC1_TFB
RIOI.RIOI_OLOGIC1_OQ->RIOI_OLOGIC1_OFB

@hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hansfbaier commented Dec 6, 2022

If we had RapidWright available with the python interface, getting the PPIPs would be as easy as that

@hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Actually as those never change, dumping them once and commiting them should be fine

@tmichalak
Copy link
Contributor

If we had RapidWright available with the python interface, getting the PPIPs would be as easy as that

@hansfbaier I don't mind installing RW python package and calling your script. Actually this option is cleaner than checking in a file that at some point in the future no one will know where it came from.

@hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tmichalak comparing the RW results with current results, it also looks like RW is missing some ppips, most notably the marked ones here, which nextpnr-xilinx currently uses:
image

I started writing a replacement for 071-ppips based on RW, but I am hesitating, because the results
are dramatically smaller and that might break the existing PnR tools.

@hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK here we go, let's compare the results: #2068

@hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tmichalak According to @mithro here #2068
this interim fix is the way to go, until the data is available via the interchange format.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants