Improve SmartCorrelatedSelector consistency with ties#825
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #825 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.04% 98.04%
=======================================
Files 111 111
Lines 4653 4653
Branches 742 742
=======================================
Hits 4562 4562
Misses 56 56
Partials 35 35 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Hi @ClaudioSalvatoreArcidiacono Hope you are doing well and thanks for the patience regarding this PR. We are releasing a new version of feature-engine soon and we could try and make this PR part of it. I am happy to accept the change in the sorting algorithm, which will resolve the issue for most cases. But I don't want to pass from sets to lists. That will break backward compatibility. Could you please rebase main and update the PR with these changes? |
…ove-smart-correlated-selector-consistency-with-ties
|
Hey @solegalli, I have updated the MR as you requested, could you take a second look? The inconsistencies with ties will still remain in case we select "model_performance" as a selection metric but it should be solved for all other selection methods. |
|
Thanks a ton! |
Fixes #824