Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Code Quality: Generative resource management and refactoring #15662

Merged
merged 50 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

XTorLukas
Copy link
Contributor

Resolved / Related Issues

To prevent extra work, all changes to the Files codebase must link to an approved issue marked as Ready to build. Please insert the issue number following the hashtag with the issue number that this Pull Request resolves.

Steps used to test these changes

Stability is a top priority for Files and all changes are required to go through testing before being merged into the repo. Please include a list of steps that you used to test this PR.

  1. Generated Strings properties from keys in primary Resources file
  2. Compatible import from .resw and .json file

@XTorLukas XTorLukas changed the title Code Quality: Generative resource management Code Quality: Generative resource management and refactoring Jun 26, 2024
@0x5bfa
Copy link
Member

0x5bfa commented Jul 1, 2024

Is this still on-development?
If you are ok, I’d like to review.

@0x5bfa 0x5bfa self-requested a review July 1, 2024 02:25
@@ -19,8 +19,10 @@
</PropertyGroup>

<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="MarcosLopezC.LightJson" Version="0.5.3" PrivateAssets="all" />
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're trying hard to avoid additional references especially from third parties. Fyi @0x5bfa

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Source generator affects package size?

@yaira2 yaira2 requested review from 0x5bfa and hez2010 August 26, 2024 16:01
Copy link
Member

@0x5bfa 0x5bfa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This might collide with my PR but looks good to me.

@XTorLukas XTorLukas requested a review from 0x5bfa August 27, 2024 22:05
Copy link
Member

@0x5bfa 0x5bfa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Every methods are well-documented! LGTM and thanks for the conflict resolving.
Could you share the latest out put as a screenshot?

@yaira2 yaira2 merged commit e921fd0 into files-community:main Sep 3, 2024
6 checks passed
@yaira2
Copy link
Member

yaira2 commented Sep 3, 2024

Thank you

@yaira2 yaira2 added ready to merge Pull requests that are approved and ready to merge and removed needs - code review labels Sep 3, 2024
@XTorLukas XTorLukas deleted the xtorlukas/SGResw branch September 3, 2024 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready to merge Pull requests that are approved and ready to merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants