Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add building with Podman managed containers #54

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bbros-dev
Copy link

Issue #53: Support building with Podman: make build-in-podman

Description of changes:

  1. Add Makefile target build-in-podman.
  2. Update README.md.
  3. Add gitignore .vscode.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

1. Add Makefile target build-in-podman.
2. Update README.md.
3. Add gitignore .vscode.

Signed-off-by: Mark Van de Vyver <[email protected]>
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
firectl
firectl.sha256
.vscode
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For editor-specific files, I think it would be better to use a per-user global gitignore file.

https://help.github.com/en/github/using-git/ignoring-files#configuring-ignored-files-for-all-repositories-on-your-computer

Comment on lines +22 to +23
1. `make build-in-docker`
1. `make build-in-podman`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about using * instead? People may see the instruction as "First make build-in-docker, then make build-in-podman", but the intention here is OR, not AND.

* `make build-in-docker`
* `make build-in-podman`

Copy link
Author

@bbros-dev bbros-dev Apr 12, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point:

*  `make build-in-docker`, or
*  `make build-in-podman`

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants