Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Detect cargo-nextest as top-level cargo test runner #7

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023
Merged

Conversation

flub
Copy link
Owner

@flub flub commented Nov 25, 2023

This accepts cargo-nextest as the top-level binary that drives a cargo
testrun. This fixes the re-using of the numbered testdir between all
the processeses started by a testrun under cargo-nextest. Probably.

Closes #4

flub added 2 commits October 4, 2023 14:43
This accepts cargo-nextest as the top-level binary that drives a cargo
testrun.  This fixes the re-using of the numbered testdir between all
the processeses started by a testrun under cargo-nextest.  Probably.
@flub flub mentioned this pull request Nov 25, 2023
Copy link

@Arqu Arqu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Codewise LGTM, but I need to play more with it for any better response. Would be cool if @hellertime managed to check it out and test it out in his workflow.

@hellertime
Copy link

👋 just got back to this after the US holiday. I updated my crate to use this branch, and it looks to have solved the issue. LGTM!

@flub flub merged commit e85f794 into main Nov 27, 2023
@flub flub deleted the flub/nexttest branch November 27, 2023 15:40
@flub
Copy link
Owner Author

flub commented Nov 27, 2023

thanks both for the feedback!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for cargo-nextest
3 participants