Skip to content

Conversation

anesthetice
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #1504

Two things left to iron out:

  1. is "Shaper Extra" the best way to describe what the new popover contains?
  2. padding seems a little short between end of 'Highlighting' and 'Constraints'

@anesthetice
Copy link
Contributor Author

unnamed

<property name="width-request">300</property>
<property name="selection-mode">none</property>
<object class="GtkLabel">
<property name="label" translatable="yes">Shaper Extra</property>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about a simple

Shape Configuration (2/2)

and adding a (1/2) on the first page.

Though at that point a next/previous page navigation makes more sense.

Maybe a nagivation view can work inside of the popover ? https://gnome.pages.gitlab.gnome.org/libadwaita/doc/1.7/class.NavigationView.html

@anesthetice
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Doublonmousse Thanks for taking the time to review this PR, I'll try to work on it later today, I think naming the new popup Shape Configuration (2/2) is better than the current Shaper Extra, but still feels a little off, as it wouldn't be clear why these two were made separate...

What do you think about renaming what is currently called Shape Configuration to Shape Styling (and re-using the previous icon that changes depending on whether the Smooth or Rough style is enabled); and instead of Shaper Extra just Shaper Configuration?

As for implementing next/previous page navigation, I'm not in favor, as that would increase the steps needed to change something.

@Doublonmousse
Copy link
Collaborator

@Doublonmousse Thanks for taking the time to review this PR, I'll try to work on it later today, I think naming the new popup Shape Configuration (2/2) is better than the current Shaper Extra, but still feels a little off, as it wouldn't be clear why these two were made separate...

What do you think about renaming what is currently called Shape Configuration to Shape Styling (and re-using the previous icon that changes depending on whether the Smooth or Rough style is enabled); and instead of Shaper Extra just Shaper Configuration?

Then the gear icon would be used for the second panel I guess.
Yes that makes sense and it's also a little more coherent/useful that what we have now (so we know both the shape and the style mode)

As for implementing next/previous page navigation, I'm not in favor, as that would increase the steps needed to change something.

I would have kept the two buttons but added one to switch from one popup to the other. Although after the change of icon it's not needed anymore because you'd know where to click in the first place

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Shape Tool settings not opening in Windows after building from MSYS2

2 participants