-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(ledger): remove dead code #1640
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes involve the complete removal of the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- components/ledger/internal/machine/script/compiler/source.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
components/ledger/internal/machine/script/compiler/source.go (2)
Line range hint
10-34
:
LGTM!The
TakeFromSource
method is self-contained and does not reference the removedVisitValueAwareSource
method. The logic appears to be correct.
Line range hint
36-131
:
LGTM! But verify the impact of the removed method.The
VisitSource
method is complex and handles various cases. The logic appears to be correct, but ensure that the removal of theVisitValueAwareSource
method does not affect its functionality.Verification successful
Verification Complete: No Impact from Removed Method
The
VisitSource
method functions correctly, and there are no references or definitions of theVisitValueAwareSource
method in the codebase. The removal of theVisitValueAwareSource
method does not impact the functionality of theVisitSource
method.
- No references or definitions of
VisitValueAwareSource
found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the removed `VisitValueAwareSource` method. # Test: Search for references to `VisitValueAwareSource`. Expect: No references found. rg --type go 'VisitValueAwareSource'Length of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of the `VisitValueAwareSource` method and check for any remaining references. # Search for the definition of the `VisitValueAwareSource` method to confirm its removal. rg --type go 'func VisitValueAwareSource' # Search for any remaining references to `VisitValueAwareSource` in the codebase. rg --type go 'VisitValueAwareSource'Length of output: 80
Apparently this is dead code and deleting it doesn't cause any test to break. I cannot find this function used anywhere using lexical search around the repo
Should we delete this? Or is it exposed publicly?