-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(tools): Lock only active stacks #1641
Conversation
WalkthroughThis change enhances the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- components/operator/tools/kubectl-stacks/lock.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
components/operator/tools/kubectl-stacks/lock.go (3)
Line range hint
10-23
:
LGTM!The
NewLockCommand
function is well-structured and does not contain any issues.
Line range hint
50-69
:
LGTM!The
lockStack
function is well-structured and does not contain any issues.
42-45
: LGTM! But verify theDisabled
field usage in the codebase.The added condition to skip disabled stacks improves the robustness of the function.
Ensure that the
Disabled
field is correctly used and initialized in the codebase.Verification successful
The
Disabled
field appears to be well-integrated and utilized across the codebase.The field is used in multiple files and contexts, including JSON serialization, deep copy functions, and various checks. This indicates proper integration and usage.
components/operator/api/stack.formance.com/v1beta3/stack_types.go
components/operator/internal/resources/legacy/stacks/init.go
components/operator/tools/kubectl-stacks/lock.go
components/operator/internal/core/controllers.go
components/operator/internal/tests/auth_controller_test.go
Ensure that the
Disabled
field is correctly initialized and used in these locations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `Disabled` field in the codebase. # Test: Search for the `Disabled` field usage. Expect: Proper initialization and usage. rg --type go 'Disabled'Length of output: 13959
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The operator do some operations even on disabled stack.
No description provided.