Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ledger): refine benchmarks #1679

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024
Merged

feat(ledger): refine benchmarks #1679

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

gfyrag
Copy link
Contributor

@gfyrag gfyrag commented Sep 6, 2024

  • test(ledger): add test server
  • feat: move benchmarks to test/performance and use test server

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the build and testing processes in the components/ledger directory, including improved latency calculations in logging and middleware functions. A new performance benchmarking test file is introduced, and method visibility adjustments are made in the testing utilities. Overall, the focus is on refining testing capabilities and improving code clarity.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/ledger/Earthfile Modifications to the Dockerfile for enhanced build and testing processes, including new COPY commands.
components/ledger/cmd/serve.go Updated latency calculation in the Log function for accurate request handling logging.
components/ledger/internal/api/v1/middlewares_metrics.go Simplified latency calculation in MetricsMiddleware by using start directly.
components/ledger/internal/api/v2/middlewares_metrics.go Similar simplification of latency calculation in MetricsMiddleware.
components/ledger/test/performance/performance_test.go Introduced performance benchmarking tests for the ledger system, including setup and execution logic.
libs/go-libs/testing/utils/testing_main.go Renamed Close method to close, changing its visibility from public to private.
libs/go-libs/time/time.go Changed parameter type of Since function from time.Time to a custom Time type.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Server
    participant Database

    Client->>Server: Send request
    Server->>Database: Query data
    Database-->>Server: Return data
    Server-->>Client: Send response
Loading

🐇 In the meadow, I hop with glee,
New tests and logs, oh what a spree!
With benchmarks set, we race and play,
In code we trust, come what may!
Hooray for changes, bright and bold,
A tale of ledger, now retold! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9109bb and c775ef5.

Files selected for processing (8)
  • components/ledger/Earthfile (4 hunks)
  • components/ledger/cmd/serve.go (1 hunks)
  • components/ledger/internal/api/v1/middlewares_metrics.go (1 hunks)
  • components/ledger/internal/api/v2/middlewares_metrics.go (1 hunks)
  • components/ledger/internal/storage/driver/driver.go (1 hunks)
  • components/ledger/test/performance/performance_test.go (1 hunks)
  • libs/go-libs/testing/utils/testing_main.go (2 hunks)
  • libs/go-libs/time/time.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (12)
libs/go-libs/testing/utils/testing_main.go (2)

39-39: Visibility Change Approved

The change from Close to close, making it a private method, is a good practice for encapsulating functionality within the package. This change restricts the method's accessibility, which is likely intended to control how cleanup operations are managed.


48-48: Verify External Usage

With the method Close now being private and renamed to close, ensure that there are no external invocations that might lead to runtime errors. This change should be verified across the codebase.

Verification successful

Verification Successful: No External Invocations Found

The Close method, now renamed to close and made private, has no external invocations across the codebase. This change will not lead to runtime errors due to external usage.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that there are no external invocations of the `Close` method which is now private.

# Test: Search for external invocations of `Close`. Expect: No occurrences outside the package.
rg --type go -g '!libs/go-libs/testing/utils/testing_main.go' 'Close' | grep -v 'close'

Length of output: 64215

components/ledger/internal/api/v1/middlewares_metrics.go (2)

43-43: Simplification of Latency Calculation Approved

The change to directly use time.Since(start) simplifies the latency calculation and enhances code clarity. This is a positive change as it removes unnecessary complexity.


43-43: Verify Latency Calculation Accuracy

Ensure that the simplified latency calculation accurately reflects the time elapsed since the middleware began processing the request. This verification is crucial to maintain the integrity of performance metrics.

Verification successful

Latency Calculation is Accurate

The latency calculation using time.Since(start) accurately reflects the time elapsed since the middleware began processing the request. This is because it relies on the Go standard library's time.Since function, which is designed to provide precise time duration calculations. No further action is needed.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the accuracy of the latency calculation.

# Test: Review the implementation of `time.Since` to ensure it correctly calculates the elapsed time.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func Since(t Time) Duration {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 219

components/ledger/internal/api/v2/middlewares_metrics.go (2)

43-43: Simplification of Latency Calculation Approved

The change to directly use time.Since(start) in the v2 middleware, similar to the change in v1, simplifies the latency calculation and enhances code clarity. This consistency across versions is beneficial.


43-43: Verify Latency Calculation Consistency and Accuracy

Ensure that the simplified latency calculation in v2 is consistent with v1 and accurately reflects the time elapsed since the middleware began processing the request. This verification is crucial to maintain the integrity of performance metrics across versions.

Verification successful

Latency Calculation Consistency Verified

The latency calculation using time.Since(start) is consistent and identical in both v1 and v2 middleware implementations. This ensures that the performance metrics' integrity is maintained across versions. No discrepancies were found.

  • components/ledger/internal/api/v1/middlewares_metrics.go: latency := time.Since(start)
  • components/ledger/internal/api/v2/middlewares_metrics.go: latency := time.Since(start)
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency and accuracy of the latency calculation across v1 and v2.

# Test: Compare the implementation of `time.Since` in both versions to ensure they are consistent and accurate.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func Since(t Time) Duration {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 219


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Locate middleware files for both v1 and v2
fd 'middlewares_metrics.go'

# Search for `time.Since` usage in the located middleware files
rg 'time.Since' $(fd 'middlewares_metrics.go')

Length of output: 478

libs/go-libs/time/time.go (1)

131-132: Approve the change but verify usage.

The modification to the Since function to accept the custom Time type enhances encapsulation and is consistent with the aim of improving time handling abstraction. However, ensure that all usages of the Since function have been updated to pass the Time type instead of time.Time.

Run the following script to verify the function usage:

components/ledger/cmd/serve.go (1)

83-83: Approve the change but verify integration.

The modification to use time.Since(start) directly in the Log function simplifies the code and ensures accurate latency measurement. Verify that this change integrates well with the rest of the system, particularly in how latency data is logged and used.

Run the following script to verify the integration:

components/ledger/test/performance/performance_test.go (1)

39-116: Approve the benchmark setup but verify effectiveness.

The BenchmarkWorstCase function is well-structured and appears to simulate a high-load scenario effectively. However, verify the effectiveness of the benchmarking setup, particularly in terms of resource management and the accuracy of performance measurements.

Run the following script to verify the effectiveness:

components/ledger/internal/storage/driver/driver.go (1)

229-231: Review of the new GetConnectionOptions method.

The addition of the GetConnectionOptions method to the Driver struct is straightforward and seems to be implemented correctly. However, it's important to ensure that exposing connectionOptions does not inadvertently expose sensitive information or alter the security posture of the application.

components/ledger/Earthfile (2)

147-148: Refinement of benchmark execution commands.

The modification to include the -tags it flag in the benchmark execution commands is a thoughtful addition that ensures integration tests are considered during benchmarking. This change aligns with the PR's objective to refine the benchmarking process.


53-53: Enhancements to the testing and benchmarking setup.

The addition of the test directory in multiple stages (tests, lint, and bench sections) and the adjustment of the working directory for benchmarks are positive changes that enhance the organization and focus of testing and benchmarking. However, it's important to consider the potential impact on build size and time due to these additions.

Also applies to: 108-109, 129-130

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c775ef5 and b8608f7.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • components/ledger/Earthfile (4 hunks)
  • components/ledger/cmd/serve.go (1 hunks)
  • components/ledger/internal/api/v1/middlewares_metrics.go (1 hunks)
  • components/ledger/internal/api/v2/middlewares_metrics.go (1 hunks)
  • components/ledger/test/performance/performance_test.go (1 hunks)
  • libs/go-libs/testing/utils/testing_main.go (2 hunks)
  • libs/go-libs/time/time.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
  • components/ledger/Earthfile
  • components/ledger/cmd/serve.go
  • components/ledger/internal/api/v1/middlewares_metrics.go
  • components/ledger/internal/api/v2/middlewares_metrics.go
  • components/ledger/test/performance/performance_test.go
  • libs/go-libs/testing/utils/testing_main.go
  • libs/go-libs/time/time.go

@gfyrag gfyrag added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 17, 2024
@gfyrag gfyrag removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Sep 17, 2024
@gfyrag gfyrag added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 17, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 17, 2024
@gfyrag gfyrag added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9353d2f Sep 18, 2024
9 checks passed
@gfyrag gfyrag deleted the feat/ledger-benchmarks branch September 18, 2024 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants