Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 8, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@next/eslint-plugin-next (source) 15.5.4 -> 15.5.5 age adoption passing confidence
@types/node (source) 24.6.2 -> 24.8.0 age adoption passing confidence
@types/react (source) 19.2.0 -> 19.2.2 age adoption passing confidence
@types/react-dom (source) 19.2.0 -> 19.2.2 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.45.0 -> 8.46.1 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.45.0 -> 8.46.1 age adoption passing confidence
eslint-config-next (source) 15.5.4 -> 15.5.5 age adoption passing confidence
lucide-react (source) ^0.544.0 -> ^0.546.0 age adoption passing confidence
next (source) 15.5.4 -> 15.5.5 age adoption passing confidence
typescript-eslint (source) 8.45.0 -> 8.46.1 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

vercel/next.js (@​next/eslint-plugin-next)

v15.5.5

Compare Source

[!NOTE]
This release is backporting bug fixes. It does not include all pending features/changes on canary.

Core Changes
  • Split code-frame into separate compiled package (#​84238)
  • Add deprecation warning to Runtime config (#​84650)
  • fix: unstable_cache should perform blocking revalidation during ISR revalidation (#​84716)
  • feat: experimental.middlewareClientMaxBodySize body cloning limit (#​84722)
  • fix: missing next/link types with typedRoutes (#​84779)
Misc Changes
  • docs: early October improvements and fixes (#​84334)
Credits

Huge thanks to @​devjiwonchoi, @​ztanner, and @​icyJoseph for helping!

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.46.1

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-misused-promises] special-case .finally not to report when a promise returning function is provided as an argument (#​11667)
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-optional-chain] include mixed "nullish comparison style" chains in checks (#​11533)
❤️ Thank You
  • mdm317
  • Ronen Amiel

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.46.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unsafe-member-access] add allowOptionalChaining option (#​11659)
  • rule-schema-to-typescript-types: clean up and make public (#​11633)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-readonly-parameter-types] ignore tagged primitives (#​11660)
  • typescript-estree: forbid abstract method and accessor to have implementation (#​11657)
  • eslint-plugin: removed error type previously deprecated (#​11674)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-deprecated] ignore deprecated export imports (#​11603)
  • eslint-plugin: [unbound-method] improve wording around this: void and binding (#​11634)
  • rule-tester: deprecate TestCaseError#type and LintMessage#nodeType (#​11628)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-floating-promises] remove excess parentheses in suggestions (#​11487)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.46.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.46.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

vercel/next.js (eslint-config-next)

v15.5.5

Compare Source

lucide-icons/lucide (lucide-react)

v0.546.0: Version 0.546.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: lucide-icons/lucide@0.545.0...0.546.0

v0.545.0

Compare Source

vercel/next.js (next)

v15.5.5

Compare Source

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.46.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.46.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "on wednesday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies label Oct 8, 2025
@renovate renovate bot temporarily deployed to docs-development October 8, 2025 03:14 Inactive
@auto-maid
Copy link
Contributor

auto-maid bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Documentation Preview

Latest Commit SHA 0d8a8f9
Preview URL https://156e7ef2.forui-docs-dev.pages.dev/docs

You're seeing this because the docs/samples were updated.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/docs-minor-revisions branch from 8596989 to aa202fd Compare October 9, 2025 22:48
@renovate renovate bot had a problem deploying to docs-development October 9, 2025 22:48 Failure
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/docs-minor-revisions branch from aa202fd to af958cc Compare October 11, 2025 16:49
@renovate renovate bot had a problem deploying to docs-development October 11, 2025 16:49 Failure
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/docs-minor-revisions branch from af958cc to ddfafbe Compare October 13, 2025 17:41
@renovate renovate bot had a problem deploying to docs-development October 13, 2025 17:41 Failure
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/docs-minor-revisions branch from ddfafbe to 0d8a8f9 Compare October 16, 2025 12:48
@renovate renovate bot deployed to docs-development October 16, 2025 12:48 Active
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants