Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: claims bounded storage #628

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023
Merged

fix: claims bounded storage #628

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023

Conversation

Roznovjak
Copy link
Contributor

This PR removes without_storage_info from the claims pallet.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2023

Crate versions that have been updated:

  • pallet-claims: v3.4.6 -> v3.4.7

Runtime version has not been increased.

@mrq1911 mrq1911 changed the title feat(claims): bounded storage fix: claims bounded storage Jul 4, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (084853b) 65.17% compared to head (4478728) 65.17%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #628   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.17%   65.17%           
=======================================
  Files         131      131           
  Lines        9647     9647           
=======================================
  Hits         6287     6287           
  Misses       3360     3360           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pallets/claims/src/lib.rs 76.78% <ø> (ø)
pallets/claims/src/traits.rs 47.05% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@Roznovjak Roznovjak merged commit d0e04e2 into master Jul 6, 2023
8 checks passed
@Roznovjak Roznovjak deleted the claims_bounded_storage branch July 6, 2023 09:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants