🤖🤖🤖 Update quality-playbook skill to v1.4.0 + add agent#1402
Open
andrewstellman wants to merge 13 commits intogithub:stagedfrom
Open
🤖🤖🤖 Update quality-playbook skill to v1.4.0 + add agent#1402andrewstellman wants to merge 13 commits intogithub:stagedfrom
andrewstellman wants to merge 13 commits intogithub:stagedfrom
Conversation
Contributor
🔍 Skill Validator Results⛔ Findings need attention
Summary
Full validator output```text Found 145 skill(s) [quality-playbook] 📊 quality-playbook: 66,332 BPE tokens [chars/4: 73,092] (comprehensive ✗), 128 sections, 44 code blocks [quality-playbook] ⚠ Skill is 66,332 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 73,092) — "comprehensive" skills hurt performance by 2.9pp on average. Consider splitting into 2–3 focused skills. [acreadiness-assess] 📊 acreadiness-assess: 808 BPE tokens [chars/4: 839] (detailed ✓), 3 sections, 1 code blocks [acreadiness-generate-instructions] 📊 acreadiness-generate-instructions: 2,129 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,104] (detailed ✓), 9 sections, 2 code blocks [acreadiness-policy] 📊 acreadiness-policy: 1,005 BPE tokens [chars/4: 940] (detailed ✓), 11 sections, 4 code blocks [ai-team-orchestration] 📊 ai-team-orchestration: 1,436 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,400] (detailed ✓), 13 sections, 5 code blocks [arize-ai-provider-integration] 📊 arize-ai-provider-integration: 2,632 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,548] (standard ~), 29 sections, 16 code blocks [arize-ai-provider-integration] ⚠ Skill is 2,632 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 2,548) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [arize-ai-provider-integration] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [arize-annotation] 📊 arize-annotation: 2,517 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,689] (standard ~), 27 sections, 15 code blocks [arize-annotation] ⚠ Skill is 2,517 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 2,689) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [arize-annotation] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [arize-dataset] 📊 arize-dataset: 3,818 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,809] (standard ~), 51 sections, 16 code blocks [arize-dataset] ⚠ Skill is 3,818 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,809) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [arize-evaluator] 📊 arize-evaluator: 7,814 BPE tokens [chars/4: 8,033] (comprehensive ✗), 59 sections, 28 code blocks [arize-evaluator] ⚠ Skill is 7,814 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 8,033) — "comprehensive" skills hurt performance by 2.9pp on average. Consider splitting into 2–3 focused skills. [arize-experiment] 📊 arize-experiment: 4,589 BPE tokens [chars/4: 4,610] (standard ~), 34 sections, 20 code blocks [arize-experiment] ⚠ Skill is 4,589 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 4,610) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [arize-instrumentation] 📊 arize-instrumentation: 4,935 BPE tokens [chars/4: 5,061] (standard ~), 19 sections, 3 code blocks [arize-instrumentation] ⚠ Skill is 4,935 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 5,061) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [arize-link] 📊 arize-link: 1,203 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,088] (detailed ✓), 9 sections, 6 code blocks [arize-prompt-optimization] 📊 arize-prompt-optimization: 4,451 BPE tokens [chars/4: 4,762] (standard ~), 58 sections, 19 code blocks [arize-prompt-optimization] ⚠ Skill is 4,451 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 4,762) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [arize-trace] 📊 arize-trace: 5,873 BPE tokens [chars/4: 5,831] (comprehensive ✗), 43 sections, 10 code blocks [arize-trace] ⚠ Skill is 5,873 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 5,831) — "comprehensive" skills hurt performance by 2.9pp on average. Consider splitting into 2–3 focused skills. [automate-this] 📊 automate-this: 2,869 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,107] (standard ~), 16 sections, 8 code blocks [automate-this] ⚠ Skill is 2,869 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,107) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [suggest-awesome-github-copilot-agents] 📊 suggest-awesome-github-copilot-agents: 1,467 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,979] (detailed ✓), 9 sections, 0 code blocks [suggest-awesome-github-copilot-agents] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [suggest-awesome-github-copilot-instructions] 📊 suggest-awesome-github-copilot-instructions: 1,499 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,904] (detailed ✓), 11 sections, 1 code blocks [suggest-awesome-github-copilot-skills] 📊 suggest-awesome-github-copilot-skills: 1,725 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,018] (detailed ✓), 11 sections, 1 code blocks [az-cost-optimize] 📊 az-cost-optimize: 2,956 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,218] (standard ~), 12 sections, 7 code blocks [az-cost-optimize] ⚠ Skill is 2,956 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,218) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [azure-pricing] 📊 azure-pricing: 2,315 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,371] (detailed ✓), 23 sections, 4 code blocks [azure-resource-health-diagnose] 📊 azure-resource-health-diagnose: 2,492 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,859] (detailed ✓), 12 sections, 8 code blocks [import-infrastructure-as-code] 📊 import-infrastructure-as-code: 4,135 BPE tokens [chars/4: 4,680] (standard ~), 30 sections, 11 code blocks [import-infrastructure-as-code] ⚠ Skill is 4,135 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 4,680) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [remember-interactive-programming] 📊 remember-interactive-programming: 175 BPE tokens [chars/4: 221] (compact ✓), 0 sections, 0 code blocks [remember-interactive-programming] ⚠ Skill is only 175 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 221) — may be too sparse to provide actionable guidance. [remember-interactive-programming] ⚠ No section headers — agents navigate structured documents better. [remember-interactive-programming] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [remember-interactive-programming] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [content-management-systems] 📊 content-management-systems: 1,040 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,324] (detailed ✓), 13 sections, 0 code blocks [content-management-systems] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [markdown-to-html] 📊 markdown-to-html: 6,711 BPE tokens [chars/4: 6,151] (comprehensive ✗), 100 sections, 50 code blocks [markdown-to-html] ⚠ Skill is 6,711 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 6,151) — "comprehensive" skills hurt performance by 2.9pp on average. Consider splitting into 2–3 focused skills. [markdown-to-html] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [quasi-coder] 📊 quasi-coder: 3,116 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,907] (standard ~), 37 sections, 11 code blocks [quasi-coder] ⚠ Skill is 3,116 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,907) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [web-coder] 📊 web-coder: 4,784 BPE tokens [chars/4: 5,245] (standard ~), 47 sections, 10 code blocks [web-coder] ⚠ Skill is 4,784 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 5,245) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [context-map] 📊 context-map: 249 BPE tokens [chars/4: 287] (compact ✓), 10 sections, 1 code blocks [refactor-plan] 📊 refactor-plan: 356 BPE tokens [chars/4: 355] (compact ✓), 15 sections, 1 code blocks [what-context-needed] 📊 what-context-needed: 209 BPE tokens [chars/4: 219] (compact ✓), 9 sections, 1 code blocks [integrate-context-matic] 📊 integrate-context-matic: 1,496 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,574] (detailed ✓), 12 sections, 0 code blocks [integrate-context-matic] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [integrate-context-matic] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [onboard-context-matic] 📊 onboard-context-matic: 3,136 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,361] (standard ~), 13 sections, 12 code blocks [onboard-context-matic] ⚠ Skill is 3,136 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,361) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [copilot-sdk] 📊 copilot-sdk: 5,749 BPE tokens [chars/4: 6,042] (comprehensive ✗), 63 sections, 41 code blocks [copilot-sdk] ⚠ Skill is 5,749 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 6,042) — "comprehensive" skills hurt performance by 2.9pp on average. Consider splitting into 2–3 focused skills. [aspnet-minimal-api-openapi] 📊 aspnet-minimal-api-openapi: 343 BPE tokens [chars/4: 439] (compact ✓), 5 sections, 0 code blocks [aspnet-minimal-api-openapi] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [aspnet-minimal-api-openapi] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [csharp-async] 📊 csharp-async: 379 BPE tokens [chars/4: 466] (compact ✓), 7 sections, 0 code blocks [csharp-async] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [csharp-async] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [csharp-mstest] 📊 csharp-mstest: 3,249 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,458] (standard ~), 31 sections, 22 code blocks [csharp-mstest] ⚠ Skill is 3,249 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,458) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [csharp-nunit] 📊 csharp-nunit: 636 BPE tokens [chars/4: 711] (detailed ✓), 8 sections, 0 code blocks [csharp-nunit] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [csharp-nunit] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [csharp-tunit] 📊 csharp-tunit: 1,164 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,287] (detailed ✓), 10 sections, 0 code blocks [csharp-tunit] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [csharp-tunit] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [csharp-xunit] 📊 csharp-xunit: 599 BPE tokens [chars/4: 677] (detailed ✓), 8 sections, 0 code blocks [csharp-xunit] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [csharp-xunit] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [dotnet-best-practices] 📊 dotnet-best-practices: 602 BPE tokens [chars/4: 808] (detailed ✓), 12 sections, 0 code blocks [dotnet-best-practices] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [dotnet-best-practices] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [dotnet-upgrade] 📊 dotnet-upgrade: 1,354 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,768] (detailed ✓), 1 sections, 0 code blocks [dotnet-upgrade] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [dotnet-upgrade] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [csharp-mcp-server-generator] 📊 csharp-mcp-server-generator: 459 BPE tokens [chars/4: 560] (detailed ✓), 9 sections, 0 code blocks [csharp-mcp-server-generator] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [postgresql-code-review] 📊 postgresql-code-review: 1,646 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,847] (detailed ✓), 21 sections, 8 code blocks [postgresql-optimization] 📊 postgresql-optimization: 2,651 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,834] (standard ~), 36 sections, 20 code blocks [postgresql-optimization] ⚠ Skill is 2,651 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 2,834) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [postgresql-optimization] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [sql-code-review] 📊 sql-code-review: 2,112 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,220] (detailed ✓), 36 sections, 15 code blocks [sql-optimization] 📊 sql-optimization: 2,212 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,298] (detailed ✓), 28 sections, 14 code blocks [dataverse-python-advanced-patterns] 📊 dataverse-python-advanced-patterns: 242 BPE tokens [chars/4: 291] (compact ✓), 0 sections, 0 code blocks [dataverse-python-advanced-patterns] ⚠ No section headers — agents navigate structured documents better. [dataverse-python-advanced-patterns] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [dataverse-python-production-code] 📊 dataverse-python-production-code: 813 BPE tokens [chars/4: 913] (detailed ✓), 9 sections, 3 code blocks [dataverse-python-quickstart] 📊 dataverse-python-quickstart: 133 BPE tokens [chars/4: 163] (compact ✓), 0 sections, 0 code blocks [dataverse-python-quickstart] ⚠ Skill is only 133 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 163) — may be too sparse to provide actionable guidance. [dataverse-python-quickstart] ⚠ No section headers — agents navigate structured documents better. [dataverse-python-quickstart] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [dataverse-python-quickstart] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [dataverse-python-usecase-builder] 📊 dataverse-python-usecase-builder: 1,538 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,684] (detailed ✓), 38 sections, 5 code blocks [azure-resource-health-diagnose] 📊 azure-resource-health-diagnose: 2,492 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,859] (detailed ✓), 12 sections, 8 code blocks [multi-stage-dockerfile] 📊 multi-stage-dockerfile: 443 BPE tokens [chars/4: 577] (detailed ✓), 5 sections, 0 code blocks [multi-stage-dockerfile] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [multi-stage-dockerfile] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [doublecheck] 📊 doublecheck: 3,254 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,973] (standard ~), 26 sections, 3 code blocks [doublecheck] ⚠ Skill is 3,254 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,973) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [from-the-other-side-vega] 📊 from-the-other-side-vega: 820 BPE tokens [chars/4: 894] (detailed ✓), 9 sections, 0 code blocks [from-the-other-side-vega] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [from-the-other-side-vega] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [eyeball] 📊 eyeball: 1,486 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,637] (detailed ✓), 13 sections, 11 code blocks [geofeed-tuner] 📊 geofeed-tuner: 11,662 BPE tokens [chars/4: 12,215] (comprehensive ✗), 35 sections, 15 code blocks ❌ [geofeed-tuner] File reference './run/data/report-data.json' is 2 directories deep — maximum is 1 level from SKILL.md. ❌ [geofeed-tuner] File reference 'assets/example/01-user-input-rfc8805-feed.csv' is 2 directories deep — maximum is 1 level from SKILL.md. ❌ [geofeed-tuner] File reference './run/data/comments.json' is 2 directories deep — maximum is 1 level from SKILL.md. ❌ [geofeed-tuner] File reference './run/data/report-data.json' is 2 directories deep — maximum is 1 level from SKILL.md. ❌ [geofeed-tuner] File reference './run/data/mcp-server-payload.json' is 2 directories deep — maximum is 1 level from SKILL.md. ❌ [geofeed-tuner] File reference './run/data/mcp-server-payload.json' is 2 directories deep — maximum is 1 level from SKILL.md. ❌ [geofeed-tuner] File reference './run/data/report-data.json' is 2 directories deep — maximum is 1 level from SKILL.md. ❌ [geofeed-tuner] File reference './run/data/report-data.json' is 2 directories deep — maximum is 1 level from SKILL.md. [geofeed-tuner] ⚠ Skill is 11,662 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 12,215) — "comprehensive" skills hurt performance by 2.9pp on average. Consider splitting into 2–3 focused skills. [flowstudio-power-automate-build] 📊 flowstudio-power-automate-build: 5,040 BPE tokens [chars/4: 5,168] (comprehensive ✗), 46 sections, 17 code blocks [flowstudio-power-automate-build] ⚠ Skill is 5,040 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 5,168) — "comprehensive" skills hurt performance by 2.9pp on average. Consider splitting into 2–3 focused skills. [flowstudio-power-automate-build] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [flowstudio-power-automate-debug] 📊 flowstudio-power-automate-debug: 4,320 BPE tokens [chars/4: 4,264] (standard ~), 65 sections, 15 code blocks [flowstudio-power-automate-debug] ⚠ Skill is 4,320 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 4,264) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [flowstudio-power-automate-governance] 📊 flowstudio-power-automate-governance: 5,414 BPE tokens [chars/4: 5,786] (comprehensive ✗), 17 sections, 11 code blocks [flowstudio-power-automate-governance] ⚠ Skill is 5,414 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 5,786) — "comprehensive" skills hurt performance by 2.9pp on average. Consider splitting into 2–3 focused skills. [flowstudio-power-automate-mcp] 📊 flowstudio-power-automate-mcp: 3,243 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,176] (standard ~), 19 sections, 9 code blocks [flowstudio-power-automate-mcp] ⚠ Skill is 3,243 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,176) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [flowstudio-power-automate-monitoring] 📊 flowstudio-power-automate-monitoring: 3,809 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,609] (standard ~), 25 sections, 14 code blocks [flowstudio-power-automate-monitoring] ⚠ Skill is 3,809 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,609) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [playwright-explore-website] 📊 playwright-explore-website: 140 BPE tokens [chars/4: 171] (compact ✓), 2 sections, 0 code blocks [playwright-explore-website] ⚠ Skill is only 140 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 171) — may be too sparse to provide actionable guidance. [playwright-explore-website] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [playwright-generate-test] 📊 playwright-generate-test: 178 BPE tokens [chars/4: 220] (compact ✓), 2 sections, 0 code blocks [playwright-generate-test] ⚠ Skill is only 178 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 220) — may be too sparse to provide actionable guidance. [playwright-generate-test] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [playwright-generate-test] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [go-mcp-server-generator] 📊 go-mcp-server-generator: 1,740 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,759] (detailed ✓), 21 sections, 8 code blocks [create-spring-boot-java-project] 📊 create-spring-boot-java-project: 1,092 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,138] (detailed ✓), 17 sections, 11 code blocks [create-spring-boot-java-project] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [java-docs] 📊 java-docs: 316 BPE tokens [chars/4: 360] (compact ✓), 1 sections, 0 code blocks [java-docs] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [java-docs] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [java-junit] 📊 java-junit: 695 BPE tokens [chars/4: 746] (detailed ✓), 8 sections, 0 code blocks [java-junit] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [java-junit] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [java-springboot] 📊 java-springboot: 855 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,034] (detailed ✓), 10 sections, 0 code blocks [java-springboot] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [java-springboot] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [java-mcp-server-generator] 📊 java-mcp-server-generator: 4,637 BPE tokens [chars/4: 5,506] (standard ~), 28 sections, 19 code blocks [java-mcp-server-generator] ⚠ Skill is 4,637 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 5,506) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [kotlin-mcp-server-generator] 📊 kotlin-mcp-server-generator: 2,456 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,672] (detailed ✓), 29 sections, 13 code blocks [mcp-create-adaptive-cards] 📊 mcp-create-adaptive-cards: 2,949 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,136] (standard ~), 33 sections, 22 code blocks [mcp-create-adaptive-cards] ⚠ Skill is 2,949 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,136) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [mcp-create-declarative-agent] 📊 mcp-create-declarative-agent: 1,978 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,036] (detailed ✓), 30 sections, 12 code blocks [mcp-deploy-manage-agents] 📊 mcp-deploy-manage-agents: 2,036 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,471] (detailed ✓), 49 sections, 2 code blocks [napkin] 📊 napkin: 1,649 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,784] (detailed ✓), 12 sections, 4 code blocks [noob-mode] 📊 noob-mode: 2,604 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,765] (standard ~), 13 sections, 9 code blocks [noob-mode] ⚠ Skill is 2,604 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 2,765) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [openapi-to-application-code] 📊 openapi-to-application-code: 931 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,144] (detailed ✓), 11 sections, 1 code blocks [openapi-to-application-code] 📊 openapi-to-application-code: 931 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,144] (detailed ✓), 11 sections, 1 code blocks [openapi-to-application-code] 📊 openapi-to-application-code: 931 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,144] (detailed ✓), 11 sections, 1 code blocks [openapi-to-application-code] 📊 openapi-to-application-code: 931 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,144] (detailed ✓), 11 sections, 1 code blocks [openapi-to-application-code] 📊 openapi-to-application-code: 931 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,144] (detailed ✓), 11 sections, 1 code blocks [creating-oracle-to-postgres-master-migration-plan] 📊 creating-oracle-to-postgres-master-migration-plan: 755 BPE tokens [chars/4: 790] (detailed ✓), 6 sections, 2 code blocks [creating-oracle-to-postgres-migration-bug-report] 📊 creating-oracle-to-postgres-migration-bug-report: 473 BPE tokens [chars/4: 567] (detailed ✓), 6 sections, 0 code blocks [creating-oracle-to-postgres-migration-bug-report] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [creating-oracle-to-postgres-migration-bug-report] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [creating-oracle-to-postgres-migration-integration-tests] 📊 creating-oracle-to-postgres-migration-integration-tests: 605 BPE tokens [chars/4: 760] (detailed ✓), 4 sections, 1 code blocks [creating-oracle-to-postgres-migration-integration-tests] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [migrating-oracle-to-postgres-stored-procedures] 📊 migrating-oracle-to-postgres-stored-procedures: 493 BPE tokens [chars/4: 576] (detailed ✓), 2 sections, 1 code blocks [migrating-oracle-to-postgres-stored-procedures] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [planning-oracle-to-postgres-migration-integration-testing] 📊 planning-oracle-to-postgres-migration-integration-testing: 438 BPE tokens [chars/4: 547] (detailed ✓), 4 sections, 1 code blocks [planning-oracle-to-postgres-migration-integration-testing] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [reviewing-oracle-to-postgres-migration] 📊 reviewing-oracle-to-postgres-migration: 605 BPE tokens [chars/4: 762] (detailed ✓), 5 sections, 2 code blocks [scaffolding-oracle-to-postgres-migration-test-project] 📊 scaffolding-oracle-to-postgres-migration-test-project: 527 BPE tokens [chars/4: 632] (detailed ✓), 3 sections, 1 code blocks [scaffolding-oracle-to-postgres-migration-test-project] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [sponsor-finder] 📊 sponsor-finder: 3,085 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,991] (standard ~), 25 sections, 6 code blocks [sponsor-finder] ⚠ Skill is 3,085 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 2,991) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [phoenix-cli] 📊 phoenix-cli: 2,778 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,764] (standard ~), 19 sections, 15 code blocks [phoenix-cli] ⚠ Skill is 2,778 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 2,764) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [phoenix-cli] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [phoenix-evals] 📊 phoenix-evals: 1,089 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,126] (detailed ✓), 5 sections, 0 code blocks [phoenix-evals] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [phoenix-evals] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [phoenix-tracing] 📊 phoenix-tracing: 1,488 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,690] (detailed ✓), 17 sections, 1 code blocks [php-mcp-server-generator] 📊 php-mcp-server-generator: 2,723 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,697] (standard ~), 37 sections, 25 code blocks [php-mcp-server-generator] ⚠ Skill is 2,723 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 2,697) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [polyglot-test-agent] 📊 polyglot-test-agent: 1,611 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,676] (detailed ✓), 22 sections, 5 code blocks [power-apps-code-app-scaffold] 📊 power-apps-code-app-scaffold: 1,424 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,786] (detailed ✓), 18 sections, 2 code blocks [power-bi-dax-optimization] 📊 power-bi-dax-optimization: 1,114 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,390] (detailed ✓), 18 sections, 6 code blocks [power-bi-model-design-review] 📊 power-bi-model-design-review: 2,126 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,782] (detailed ✓), 28 sections, 17 code blocks [power-bi-performance-troubleshooting] 📊 power-bi-performance-troubleshooting: 2,078 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,591] (detailed ✓), 31 sections, 19 code blocks [power-bi-report-design-consultation] 📊 power-bi-report-design-consultation: 2,357 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,723] (detailed ✓), 22 sections, 13 code blocks [power-platform-architect] 📊 power-platform-architect: 3,104 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,609] (standard ~), 12 sections, 1 code blocks [power-platform-architect] ⚠ Skill is 3,104 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,609) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [mcp-copilot-studio-server-generator] 📊 mcp-copilot-studio-server-generator: 942 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,063] (detailed ✓), 6 sections, 2 code blocks [power-platform-mcp-connector-suite] 📊 power-platform-mcp-connector-suite: 1,348 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,590] (detailed ✓), 19 sections, 1 code blocks [power-platform-mcp-connector-suite] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [drawio] 📊 drawio: 920 BPE tokens [chars/4: 805] (detailed ✓), 13 sections, 3 code blocks [md-to-docx] 📊 md-to-docx: 676 BPE tokens [chars/4: 688] (detailed ✓), 9 sections, 3 code blocks [md-to-docx] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [breakdown-epic-arch] 📊 breakdown-epic-arch: 601 BPE tokens [chars/4: 712] (detailed ✓), 12 sections, 0 code blocks [breakdown-epic-arch] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [breakdown-epic-arch] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [breakdown-epic-pm] 📊 breakdown-epic-pm: 509 BPE tokens [chars/4: 575] (detailed ✓), 13 sections, 0 code blocks [breakdown-epic-pm] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [breakdown-epic-pm] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [breakdown-feature-implementation] 📊 breakdown-feature-implementation: 966 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,189] (detailed ✓), 9 sections, 2 code blocks [breakdown-feature-implementation] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [breakdown-feature-prd] 📊 breakdown-feature-prd: 557 BPE tokens [chars/4: 620] (detailed ✓), 13 sections, 0 code blocks [breakdown-feature-prd] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [breakdown-feature-prd] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plan] 📊 create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plan: 191 BPE tokens [chars/4: 237] (compact ✓), 4 sections, 0 code blocks [create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plan] ⚠ Skill is only 191 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 237) — may be too sparse to provide actionable guidance. [create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plan] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [create-implementation-plan] 📊 create-implementation-plan: 1,390 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,575] (detailed ✓), 22 sections, 1 code blocks [create-implementation-plan] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [create-technical-spike] 📊 create-technical-spike: 1,358 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,643] (detailed ✓), 33 sections, 1 code blocks [update-implementation-plan] 📊 update-implementation-plan: 1,400 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,595] (detailed ✓), 22 sections, 1 code blocks [update-implementation-plan] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [python-mcp-server-generator] 📊 python-mcp-server-generator: 871 BPE tokens [chars/4: 990] (detailed ✓), 13 sections, 0 code blocks [python-mcp-server-generator] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [react-audit-grep-patterns] 📊 react-audit-grep-patterns: 475 BPE tokens [chars/4: 461] (detailed ✓), 13 sections, 1 code blocks [react-audit-grep-patterns] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [react18-batching-patterns] 📊 react18-batching-patterns: 561 BPE tokens [chars/4: 621] (detailed ✓), 4 sections, 1 code blocks [react18-batching-patterns] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [react18-dep-compatibility] 📊 react18-dep-compatibility: 1,388 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,124] (detailed ✓), 10 sections, 1 code blocks [react18-dep-compatibility] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [react18-enzyme-to-rtl] 📊 react18-enzyme-to-rtl: 870 BPE tokens [chars/4: 917] (detailed ✓), 6 sections, 3 code blocks [react18-legacy-context] 📊 react18-legacy-context: 561 BPE tokens [chars/4: 620] (detailed ✓), 8 sections, 2 code blocks [react18-lifecycle-patterns] 📊 react18-lifecycle-patterns: 768 BPE tokens [chars/4: 910] (detailed ✓), 7 sections, 1 code blocks [react18-lifecycle-patterns] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [react18-string-refs] 📊 react18-string-refs: 549 BPE tokens [chars/4: 527] (detailed ✓), 6 sections, 1 code blocks [react19-concurrent-patterns] 📊 react19-concurrent-patterns: 681 BPE tokens [chars/4: 722] (detailed ✓), 9 sections, 5 code blocks [react19-source-patterns] 📊 react19-source-patterns: 462 BPE tokens [chars/4: 489] (detailed ✓), 4 sections, 1 code blocks [react19-source-patterns] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [react19-test-patterns] 📊 react19-test-patterns: 815 BPE tokens [chars/4: 790] (detailed ✓), 7 sections, 5 code blocks [roundup] 📊 roundup: 2,219 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,591] (detailed ✓), 28 sections, 0 code blocks [roundup] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [roundup] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [roundup-setup] 📊 roundup-setup: 3,202 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,669] (standard ~), 18 sections, 1 code blocks [roundup-setup] ⚠ Skill is 3,202 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,669) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [ruby-mcp-server-generator] 📊 ruby-mcp-server-generator: 3,459 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,631] (standard ~), 37 sections, 24 code blocks [ruby-mcp-server-generator] ⚠ Skill is 3,459 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,631) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [rust-mcp-server-generator] 📊 rust-mcp-server-generator: 3,088 BPE tokens [chars/4: 3,190] (standard ~), 31 sections, 24 code blocks [rust-mcp-server-generator] ⚠ Skill is 3,088 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 3,190) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [salesforce-apex-quality] 📊 salesforce-apex-quality: 1,682 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,820] (detailed ✓), 14 sections, 4 code blocks [salesforce-apex-quality] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [salesforce-component-standards] 📊 salesforce-component-standards: 2,300 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,448] (detailed ✓), 20 sections, 4 code blocks [salesforce-component-standards] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [salesforce-flow-design] 📊 salesforce-flow-design: 1,491 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,740] (detailed ✓), 15 sections, 5 code blocks [salesforce-flow-design] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review] 📊 ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review: 2,185 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,540] (detailed ✓), 19 sections, 0 code blocks [ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [structured-autonomy-generate] 📊 structured-autonomy-generate: 921 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,033] (detailed ✓), 10 sections, 3 code blocks [structured-autonomy-implement] 📊 structured-autonomy-implement: 209 BPE tokens [chars/4: 272] (compact ✓), 0 sections, 0 code blocks [structured-autonomy-implement] ⚠ No section headers — agents navigate structured documents better. [structured-autonomy-implement] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [structured-autonomy-implement] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [structured-autonomy-plan] 📊 structured-autonomy-plan: 677 BPE tokens [chars/4: 759] (detailed ✓), 9 sections, 1 code blocks [swift-mcp-server-generator] 📊 swift-mcp-server-generator: 3,781 BPE tokens [chars/4: 4,374] (standard ~), 30 sections, 18 code blocks [swift-mcp-server-generator] ⚠ Skill is 3,781 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 4,374) — approaching "comprehensive" range where gains diminish. [create-technical-spike] 📊 create-technical-spike: 1,358 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,643] (detailed ✓), 33 sections, 1 code blocks [ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review] 📊 ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review: 2,185 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,540] (detailed ✓), 19 sections, 0 code blocks [ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [csharp-nunit] 📊 csharp-nunit: 636 BPE tokens [chars/4: 711] (detailed ✓), 8 sections, 0 code blocks [csharp-nunit] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [csharp-nunit] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [java-junit] 📊 java-junit: 695 BPE tokens [chars/4: 746] (detailed ✓), 8 sections, 0 code blocks [java-junit] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [java-junit] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [playwright-explore-website] 📊 playwright-explore-website: 140 BPE tokens [chars/4: 171] (compact ✓), 2 sections, 0 code blocks [playwright-explore-website] ⚠ Skill is only 140 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 171) — may be too sparse to provide actionable guidance. [playwright-explore-website] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [playwright-generate-test] 📊 playwright-generate-test: 178 BPE tokens [chars/4: 220] (compact ✓), 2 sections, 0 code blocks [playwright-generate-test] ⚠ Skill is only 178 BPE tokens (chars/4 estimate: 220) — may be too sparse to provide actionable guidance. [playwright-generate-test] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [playwright-generate-test] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [typescript-mcp-server-generator] 📊 typescript-mcp-server-generator: 759 BPE tokens [chars/4: 925] (detailed ✓), 12 sections, 0 code blocks [typescript-mcp-server-generator] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands. [typespec-api-operations] 📊 typespec-api-operations: 2,327 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,287] (detailed ✓), 35 sections, 16 code blocks [typespec-api-operations] ⚠ No numbered workflow steps — agents follow sequenced procedures more reliably. [typespec-create-agent] 📊 typespec-create-agent: 672 BPE tokens [chars/4: 737] (detailed ✓), 5 sections, 1 code blocks [typespec-create-api-plugin] 📊 typespec-create-api-plugin: 979 BPE tokens [chars/4: 1,013] (detailed ✓), 11 sections, 9 code blocks [winui3-migration-guide] 📊 winui3-migration-guide: 2,196 BPE tokens [chars/4: 2,226] (detailed ✓), 18 sections, 13 code blocks {Ansi.Red}Skill spec conformance failures — fix the errors above.{Ansi.Reset} ❌ Duplicate skill name 'azure-resource-health-diagnose' found in 'plugins/devops-oncall/skills/azure-resource-health-diagnose' (first seen in 'plugins/azure-cloud-development/skills/azure-resource-health-diagnose') ❌ Duplicate skill name 'openapi-to-application-code' found in 'plugins/openapi-to-application-go/skills/openapi-to-application-code' (first seen in 'plugins/openapi-to-application-csharp-dotnet/skills/openapi-to-application-code') ❌ Duplicate skill name 'openapi-to-application-code' found in 'plugins/openapi-to-application-java-spring-boot/skills/openapi-to-application-code' (first seen in 'plugins/openapi-to-application-csharp-dotnet/skills/openapi-to-application-code') ❌ Duplicate skill name 'openapi-to-application-code' found in 'plugins/openapi-to-application-nodejs-nestjs/skills/openapi-to-application-code' (first seen in 'plugins/openapi-to-application-csharp-dotnet/skills/openapi-to-application-code') ❌ Duplicate skill name 'openapi-to-application-code' found in 'plugins/openapi-to-application-python-fastapi/skills/openapi-to-application-code' (first seen in 'plugins/openapi-to-application-csharp-dotnet/skills/openapi-to-application-code') ❌ Duplicate skill name 'create-technical-spike' found in 'plugins/technical-spike/skills/create-technical-spike' (first seen in 'plugins/project-planning/skills/create-technical-spike') ❌ Duplicate skill name 'ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review' found in 'plugins/testing-automation/skills/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review' (first seen in 'plugins/security-best-practices/skills/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review') ❌ Duplicate skill name 'csharp-nunit' found in 'plugins/testing-automation/skills/csharp-nunit' (first seen in 'plugins/csharp-dotnet-development/skills/csharp-nunit') ❌ Duplicate skill name 'java-junit' found in 'plugins/testing-automation/skills/java-junit' (first seen in 'plugins/java-development/skills/java-junit') ❌ Duplicate skill name 'playwright-explore-website' found in 'plugins/testing-automation/skills/playwright-explore-website' (first seen in 'plugins/frontend-web-dev/skills/playwright-explore-website') ❌ Duplicate skill name 'playwright-generate-test' found in 'plugins/testing-automation/skills/playwright-generate-test' (first seen in 'plugins/frontend-web-dev/skills/playwright-generate-test') Found 1 agent(s) ❌ [agent:Quality Playbook] Agent name 'Quality Playbook' does not match filename 'quality-playbook.agent.md' (expected 'Quality Playbook.agent.md'). ❌ [agent:Quality Playbook] Agent name 'Quality Playbook' contains invalid characters — must be lowercase alphanumeric and hyphens only. Validated 1 agent(s){Ansi.Red}Agent spec conformance failures — fix the errors above.{Ansi.Reset} |
a2b9013 to
57eae8d
Compare
- Recheck mode: say "recheck" after fixing bugs to verify fixes without re-running the full pipeline (2-10 min vs 60-90 min) - Fixed 19 bugs from bootstrap self-audit: eval injection in quality_gate.sh, bash 3.2 empty array crashes, required artifacts downgraded to WARN, json_key_count false positives, missing artifact checks, documentation inconsistencies - quality_gate.sh: integration-results.json validation depth parity, #### heading detection, functional test alternative name patterns Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
25 bug fixes from Sonnet 4.6 self-audit (3 HIGH, 8 MEDIUM, 14 LOW): - Nullglob-safe artifact detection (find replaces ls-glob) - Severity-prefixed bug ID support (BUG-H1, BUG-M3, BUG-L6) - TDD sidecar-to-log cross-validation - Recheck-results.json gate validation - Phase 5 entry gate, SEED_CHECKS.md in artifact contract table - Run metadata JSON spec for multi-model comparison - Canonical enum fixes in quality_gate.sh and references All 25 fixes verified by Sonnet recheck (25/25 FIXED). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ellman/awesome-copilot into quality-playbook-v1.4.0
aaronpowell
requested changes
Apr 28, 2026
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should live within the scripts folder per the skills spec
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This file shouldn't have to do directory walking to find the SKILL.md file, that should be always ../ from the location of the bash file
|
|
||
| **If the skill is not installed**, tell the user: | ||
|
|
||
| > The quality playbook skill isn't installed in this repository yet. Install it from the [quality-playbook repository](https://github.com/andrewstellman/quality-playbook): |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is the reason for "installing" this repo? Generally, we try to avoid having agents/skills clone external repos as that results in opacity in the security supply chain of what you install.
Contributor
Author
|
Oops, sorry about that. Good catch -- this PR ships both the skill and the
agent, but the agent should refer to the skill in awesome-copilot, not my
github. The quality-playbook agent is a thin wrapper around the skill, with
a guardrail telling the user to install the skill if it's missing. If they
installed the agent from awesome-copilot, it should send them back to
awesome-copilot to install the skill as well, not to my github page.
I'm just finishing up a new version of the skill with a lot of
improvements. Is it better to update this PR or close it out and create a
new one?
…On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 9:20 PM Aaron Powell ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** requested changes on this pull request.
------------------------------
On skills/quality-playbook/quality_gate.sh
<#1402 (comment)>
:
This should live within the scripts folder per the skills spec
<https://agentskills.io/specification>
------------------------------
On skills/quality-playbook/quality_gate.sh
<#1402 (comment)>
:
This file shouldn't have to do directory walking to find the SKILL.md
file, that should be always ../ from the location of the bash file
------------------------------
In agents/quality-playbook.agent.md
<#1402 (comment)>
:
> +
+You are a quality engineering orchestrator. Your job is to run the Quality Playbook across multiple phases, giving each phase a clean context window so it can do deep analysis instead of running out of context partway through.
+
+## Setup: find the skill
+
+Check that the quality playbook skill is installed. Look for SKILL.md in these locations, in order:
+
+1. `.github/skills/quality-playbook/SKILL.md` (Copilot)
+2. `.github/skills/SKILL.md` (Copilot, flat layout)
+3. `.claude/skills/quality-playbook/SKILL.md` (Claude Code)
+
+Also check for a `references/` directory alongside SKILL.md containing iteration.md, review_protocols.md, spec_audit.md, and verification.md.
+
+**If the skill is not installed**, tell the user:
+
+> The quality playbook skill isn't installed in this repository yet. Install it from the [quality-playbook repository](https://github.com/andrewstellman/quality-playbook):
What is the reason for "installing" this repo? Generally, we try to avoid
having agents/skills clone external repos as that results in opacity in the
security supply chain of what you install.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1402 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABZLBCPVW763BQJZDSJ65ND4YABMBAVCNFSM6AAAAACX2KNBZWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHM2DCOBVGE3DAOJWGQ>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Contributor
|
fine to iterate on this PR. We squash merge so "messy" history isn't really a problem |
- SKILL.md updated to v1.5.6 (2738 lines, was 2322 at v1.4.2). Banner + version stamps + JSON schema examples all bumped. - references/ expanded to 16 files (was 12). New: challenge_gate.md, code-only-mode.md, orchestrator_protocol.md, run_state_schema.md. Existing files updated to current QPB content. - phase_prompts/ added (9 files). New v1.5.x directory carrying externalized phase prompts the runner uses. - agents/ added inside the skill bundle (3 files: quality-playbook.agent.md, quality-playbook-claude.agent.md, calibration_orchestrator.md). The v1.5.6 install bundle includes these so README's Step 4 'claude --agent agents/...' invocation resolves from the install destination. - bin/citation_verifier.py added — required by quality_gate.py for byte-equality citation verification (per QPB BUG-005 closure). - quality_gate.sh retired in v1.4.5; replaced with quality_gate.py (Python rewrite with json.load + 108-test unit suite at upstream). agents/quality-playbook.agent.md (top-level awesome-copilot agent file) install instructions rewritten to install from awesome-copilot's own skills/quality-playbook/ folder rather than from the andrewstellman/ quality-playbook upstream — adopters discovering the skill via awesome-copilot can install without leaving the marketplace. Locations list expanded to all four supported tools (Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, Continue). Pointer to upstream preserved as alternative for users who want the full script-driven install UX (auto-detect, marker directory creation, smoke checks). Closes github#1402.
The skills index table row for quality-playbook was still listing the v1.4.2 bundled assets (quality_gate.sh + 12 references files). v1.5.6 ships 31 files: SKILL.md, quality_gate.py, bin/citation_verifier.py, 3 agents, 9 phase_prompts, 16 references, plus LICENSE.txt. Updated the row so the index reflects what's actually in skills/quality-playbook/.
Brings in new awesome-copilot main branch additions (skills + plugins landed since the PR branch last synced) ahead of QPB v1.5.6 PR review. Conflicts in plugins/ files (flowstudio-power-automate, gem-team) and docs/README.plugins.md resolved by taking origin/main's versions — these conflicts are unrelated to the QPB skill update; the PR has no opinion on plugin content.
…ook to v1.5.6 Resolved 39 conflicts by taking upstream's version (no QPB-specific changes were in conflict — all conflicts were unrelated cookbook, plugin, website, and docs files that drifted on upstream). Synced skills/quality-playbook/ to QPB v1.5.6 (31 bundled assets): agents/, phase_prompts/, bin/citation_verifier.py, quality_gate.py, plus 16 references files. Updated docs/README.skills.md row with v1.5.6 description and full bundled-assets list.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Changes from 1.3.x to 1.4.2:
agents/quality-playbook.agent.md— checks skill installation, explains phases, handles "keep going" / "help" / "what happened"Updated to v1.5.6.
Changes since v1.4.2:
SKILL.md modernized (skills bundle now includes phase_prompts/, agents/, and bin/citation_verifier.py per the v1.5.6 install contract; quality_gate.sh retired in v1.4.5 and replaced by quality_gate.py).
references/ expanded from 12 to 16 files.
The top-level agents/quality-playbook.agent.md now installs from awesome-copilot's own skills/quality-playbook/ folder instead of pointing users to the upstream Quality Playbook repo, so adopters discovering the skill via awesome-copilot can install without leaving the marketplace. Manual cp recipes provided for all four supported AI tools (Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, Continue). Pointer to the upstream repo preserved as alternative for users who want the full script-driven install UX.
Empirically validated against Cursor, Claude Code, and GitHub Copilot install flows on 2026-05-08.
See: https://www.oreilly.com/radar/ai-is-writing-our-code-faster-than-we-can-verify-it/