Don't cancel other jobs from the 3.12 job failing #93
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Because 3.12 is still a release candidate and if tests fail for it then one would always want to know if/how other versions also fail.
Note that a failure of the 3.12 job will still be treated as a failed check and will still cause the workflow to be considered to have failed, which we probably want. Setting
continue-on-error
for the job just overrides the default matrixfail-fast
behavior, so the 3.12 job won't cause other jobs from the matrix to be cancelled if it fails. (Other jobs will still cause cancellation.)I used a technique based on the one in the GitHub Actions documentation, but modified so all versions can be listed in one place and so the automatically generated job names remain short, as they were before.
This also allows
actions/setup-python
to install a prerelease for 3.12 only, and no longer for other releases. (This is less important, because only under very strange circumstances would only an old prerelease of a stable release be available to the CI runner. But treating 3.12 specially, as above, allows this to be done too, with no increase in complexity.)This may or may not be considered worthwhile, given that it should be undone sometime not long after the stable 3.12.0 comes out. However, I think the
allow-preleases
override totrue
should be undone at that time, so it seems to me that the burden is much the same either way (and the stakes very low, either way, if it is left in place too long).