-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Usage annotations #1098
Open
1313ou
wants to merge
10
commits into
globalwordnet:main
Choose a base branch
from
1313ou:pr_usage
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Usage annotations #1098
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Thanks for this. Can you create an issue to discuss this, as it would require updating more than just the data files? For reference here are the most common senses used for 'usage by exemplifies':
And these are the most common synsets:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following Francis Bond's remark that a number of examples are actually usage annotations, not examples, I propose to have a new section 'usage' that collects these (and also, later, fragments of definitions that similarly deal with usage)
I know that some of these usage notes can also - sometimes - be expressed by sense relations (notably domain_region/has_domain_region or exemplifies/is_exemplified_by), in which case the 'usage' section may turn out to be a transitional scratchpad.
But expressing usage with a relation requires identifying proper targets (Britain, UK, British English ...?) within a predefined set... that hasn't been defined yet: it's still open.
Beyond geographical locations, I found the following:
'archaic', 'dialectal', 'euphemistic', 'slang', 'literary', 'formal', 'legal', 'vulgar', 'frequent'
Should we link with the adjective, the noun ... ?
Other usage notes resist being expressed as relations:
These usage annotations may be ignored in XML output until the schema defines them or tags them with dc:something. However, some YAML tools will have to be updated, to ensure these usage notes are persistent across changes.
I'm not updating the python scripts as these are bound to disappear.