perf(gnolang): make print+println much more efficient

[odeke-em]

This change is the result of seeing print/println being reported in bugs as needing gas metering but on examination, noticed that the code causes a RAM and CPU bloat, so this makes an improvement in all dimensions by invoking:

• io.WriteString(m.Output, segments) instead of m.Output.Write([]byte(segments))
• in cases where !debug, we don't need to construct the concatenated
  string delimited by " " and can instead write the Sprint-ed string
  segments as we encounter them

$ benchstat before_println.txt after_println3.txt
name          old time/op    new time/op    delta
GnoPrintln-8    1.94ms ± 2%    1.86ms ± 4%   -4.02%  (p=0.001 n=9+9)

name          old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
GnoPrintln-8    1.92MB ± 0%    1.81MB ± 0%   -5.92%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

name          old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
GnoPrintln-8     19.0k ± 0%     16.0k ± 0%  -15.76%  (p=0.002 n=8+10)

Fixes #3951

[Gno2D2]

🛠 PR Checks Summary

All Automated Checks passed. ✅

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):

• IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
• The pull request description provides enough details

Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)
🟢 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:

1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
   • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
   • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
   • Update documentation, if required.
   • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
   • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.

☑️ Reviewer Actions:

1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.

📚 Resources:

• Report a bug with the bot.
• View the bot’s configuration file.

Debug

Automated Checks

Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: odeke-em/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 If
    ├── 🟢 Condition
    │   └── 🟢 Or
    │       ├── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the organization reviewed the pull request (with state "APPROVED")
    │       ├── 🔴 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request
    │       └── 🔴 This pull request is a draft
    └── 🟢 Then
        └── 🟢 Not (🔴 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending)

Manual Checks

**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

• Any user with comment edit permission

The pull request description provides enough details

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: core-contributors)
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is user: dependabot[bot])

Can be checked by

• team core-contributors

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 58.97436% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
gnovm/pkg/gnolang/uverse.go	58.97%	16 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[notJoon]

LGTM

remove: review/triage-pending flag