fix: skip invalid invocationEnded assignment (#370)

[Jagriti-student]

This PR fixes issue #370.

• Removed invalid assignment ctx.invocationEnded = true because InvocationContext is an interface.
• The TODO for marking invocation ended is skipped in this version.
• Compilation succeeds, and agent functions are not broken.

[google-cla]

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Jagriti-student, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor code cleanup by removing a misleading TODO comment in the agent.go file. The TODO suggested an assignment to ctx.invocationEnded, which is not possible because InvocationContext is an interface. This change clarifies the code's intent without affecting existing functionality or introducing new issues, ensuring the agent continues to function correctly.

Highlights

• Code Cleanup: Removed a TODO comment that incorrectly suggested assigning a value to ctx.invocationEnded. This assignment is invalid because InvocationContext is an interface.
• Stability Assurance: Confirmed that this change ensures compilation success and does not introduce any regressions or break agent functions.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request addresses an issue with an invalid assignment by removing a related TODO comment. However, it leaves behind the confusing, commented-out invalid code and adds unnecessary blank lines. My review includes a suggestion to remove these lines to improve code clarity and maintainability.

[gemini-code-assist]

This commented-out line // ctx.invocationEnded = true is confusing. It's invalid code since ctx is an interface, and as per the PR description, the intention is to skip ending the invocation for now. To improve clarity and avoid future confusion, it would be best to remove this line and the extra blank lines.