Skip to content

Conversation

@anubhav756
Copy link
Contributor

@anubhav756 anubhav756 commented Dec 19, 2025

Updates all quickstart guides and samples to use the new toolbox-adk package instead of the legacy toolbox-core. Also updates ToolboxToolset usage to rely on the simplified constructor (implicit authentication) and ensures correct dependency installation.

Note

The integration tests are failing because the google-adk package is not released yet with the newer changes from toolbox-adk. This is expected behavior until the package update is released.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @anubhav756, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on modernizing the documentation and sample code by migrating from the deprecated toolbox-core package to the new toolbox-adk. It also simplifies the instantiation and usage of ToolboxToolset by leveraging implicit authentication, making the examples more concise and aligned with current best practices. These changes ensure that users follow the most up-to-date methods for integrating with the toolbox ecosystem.

Highlights

  • Package Migration: All quickstart guides and samples have been updated to use the new toolbox-adk package, replacing the legacy toolbox-core.
  • Simplified Toolset Usage: The ToolboxToolset usage has been streamlined to rely on a simplified constructor, enabling implicit authentication.
  • Dependency Updates: Ensures correct dependency installation across documentation and samples, reflecting the new package structure.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request migrates ADK-based examples from the legacy toolbox-core to the new toolbox-adk package and updates the usage to a simpler ToolboxToolset constructor. The changes are generally good and align with the goal of simplifying the API.

However, I've noticed a couple of issues in the code samples that could affect users following the guides. I've left specific comments on these.

  • In colab_quickstart.ipynb, there's an inconsistent import path for ToolboxToolset.
  • In bigquery/local_quickstart.md, an asynchronous function is called without await, which will cause the sample to fail.

Additionally, the PR description states that 'all' quickstart guides are updated, but it seems the migration is focused only on the ADK examples. Other examples using toolbox-core, toolbox-langchain, etc., are not updated. It would be good to clarify the scope of this PR in the description.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@anubhav756 anubhav756 changed the title docs: migrate to toolbox-adk and simplified ToolboxToolset docs: migrate to toolbox-adk and simplified ToolboxToolset Dec 19, 2025
@anubhav756 anubhav756 assigned anubhav756 and unassigned duwenxin99 Dec 19, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@anubhav756 anubhav756 force-pushed the docs/toolbox-adk-migration branch from 29695aa to 35088ac Compare December 19, 2025 11:41
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@Yuan325 Yuan325 added priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. type: docs Improvement to the documentation for an API. labels Dec 31, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026

@anubhav756 anubhav756 force-pushed the docs/toolbox-adk-migration branch from c854e4f to b7a3493 Compare January 2, 2026 12:20
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026

2 similar comments
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026

@anubhav756 anubhav756 requested a review from averikitsch January 2, 2026 18:26
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2026

@anubhav756 anubhav756 force-pushed the docs/toolbox-adk-migration branch from e614069 to 1d2e21f Compare January 7, 2026 11:19
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2026

@anubhav756 anubhav756 force-pushed the docs/toolbox-adk-migration branch from 1d2e21f to 6cf6fde Compare January 8, 2026 12:23
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2026

@anubhav756
Copy link
Contributor Author

/gcbrun

@anubhav756 anubhav756 force-pushed the docs/toolbox-adk-migration branch from 6cf6fde to 7172250 Compare January 8, 2026 19:12
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2026

@anubhav756
Copy link
Contributor Author

/gcbrun

@anubhav756 anubhav756 force-pushed the docs/toolbox-adk-migration branch from 33b3727 to 4332ef8 Compare January 9, 2026 06:40
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2026

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2026

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. type: docs Improvement to the documentation for an API.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants