docs: fix gws setup → gws auth setup

[jpoehnelt]

Fixes #56 and #57.

The README documented gws setup in several places, but the correct command is gws auth setup. Users running gws setup got an "Unknown service 'setup'" error because setup isn't a registered API service.

Changes

• Updated all 5 references in README.md from gws setup to gws auth setup

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9641d6a

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
@googleworkspace/cli	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a documentation inaccuracy in the README.md by correcting the command used for Google Workspace CLI setup. The change ensures that users are guided to use the proper gws auth setup command, resolving issues where the previously documented gws setup led to errors and improving the overall user experience for initial setup and authentication.

Highlights

• Documentation Correction: Updated all instances of gws setup to the correct command gws auth setup in README.md to prevent "Unknown service 'setup'" errors for users.

Changelog

• .changeset/fix-setup-docs.md
  • Added a new changeset file to document the patch for the @googleworkspace/cli package.
• README.md
  • Corrected five instances of gws setup to gws auth setup to reflect the accurate command for authentication setup.
  • Updated the command example for initial setup.
  • Modified the command for subsequent logins.
  • Adjusted the command in the manual OAuth setup section.
  • Updated the command in the API enablement tip.

Activity

• No specific activity (comments, reviews, or progress updates) has been recorded for this pull request yet.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly updates all instances of gws setup to gws auth setup in the README.md file, addressing the reported issues regarding the incorrect command. The changes are accurate and directly resolve the documentation discrepancy.

_{Note: Security Review has been skipped due to the limited scope of the PR.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@206fd46). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #60   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   54.09%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       35           
  Lines           ?    11320           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     6123           
  Misses          ?     5197           
  Partials        ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.