Added 'test/' to ignorePaths array in cspell.json

[naveenmallemala5]

Fixes #5848

What changes did you make?

• Added 'test/' to ignorePaths array in cspell.json

Why did you make the changes (we will use this info to test)?

• To ignore files in the 'test/' path for spell checking.

Screenshots of Proposed Changes Of The Website (if any, please do not screen shot code changes)

Visuals before changes are applied

Visuals after changes are applied

[github-actions]

Want to review this pull request? Take a look at this documentation for a step by step guide!

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.

git checkout -b naveenmallemala5-add-test-ignorepaths-5848 gh-pages
git pull https://github.com/naveenmallemala5/HLA_website.git add-test-ignorepaths-5848

---

Note that CONTRIBUTING.md cannot previewed locally; rather it should be previewed at this URL:

https://github.com/naveenmallemala5/website/blob/add-test-ignorepaths-5848/CONTRIBUTING.md  

[kwangric]

Hey @naveenmallemala5! Looks like the PR is currently linked to the wrong issue (it's currently pointing to itself). Can you edit the first line so it references the correct issue number (#5848)?

[naveenmallemala5]

Hi @kwangric, I've updated the first line with the correct issue number (#5848), Please review, merge and close the issue. Thank you !

[t-will-gillis]

Hey @colin-macrae and @naveenmallemala5 I will leave this message on both of your PRs. Since you are both waiting for your PRs to be reviewed- you could consider reviewing each other's in the meantime and then when they are ready one of us will be available to merge them. Your respective PRs are #6006 and #6004.

[colin-macrae]

@naveenmallemala5, great job.

• The branch is going into the correct branch gh-pages. ✅
• The original issue [issue with #number] was properly referenced. ✅
• Per the instructions on the original issue, the correct code was added to cspell.json. ✅

[freaky4wrld]

Availability: Evenings
ETA: EOD 12/20

[freaky4wrld]

Hey @naveenmallemala5 thanks for taking up the issue, the changes suggested in the linked issue are done correctly, the to/from branch looks great.

I approve this PR.....