Skip to content

Conversation

@ChickenProp
Copy link

I may be missing something, but from my simple experiments so far this seems to work.

If you'd be amenable to adding this, I'll be happy to add tests and change documentation as necessary.

@harelba
Copy link
Owner

harelba commented Mar 27, 2021

Hi @ChickenProp ! thanks for the PR.

I'm in the middle of a huge change inside q's code which should provide a large improvement. I'll take a deeper look into it when i'm done.

@ChickenProp
Copy link
Author

@harelba gentle ping :) I see there's been some big changes, is this something you're in a position to look at now? (I confess I haven't actually checked if this still works.)

@harelba
Copy link
Owner

harelba commented Mar 23, 2022

thanks for the ping @ChickenProp

Indeed, I've released a very large change, although it doesn't include changes to the query parsing itself.

I was planning a major change in query parsing, but it's a very big task, and most use-cases are covered by the current "parsing". I'll take a look to see if I can introduce a smaller change that will accommodate this use-case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants