Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
default log store backend to WAL and allow disabling verification #21700
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
default log store backend to WAL and allow disabling verification #21700
Changes from 5 commits
e2f327c
6dea8c4
9de7b33
0217d78
917985e
5b59260
82225d4
7213782
e0c1f2a
27a2d16
e252813
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
~ Should we consider moving the original
bit up above the rest of this
if
block, and just check explicitly for WAL (not default) after?Main thought that crossed my mind is we're treating default and WAL as equivalent in these checks once we get past the BoltDB detection gate, so normalizing in one place is less error-prone in case of future changes and separates the defaulting from the business logic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is that what you had in mind?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was more thinking we could simplify the checks following the first defaulting block, so that we aren't repeating stuff like "default or WAL" and "!boltDB". Maybe something like this? (also switches the warning to "using BoltDB" since "ignoring 'wal'" might be confusing when default is used)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We're still ignoring config if there's a BoltDB file found - should we call that out here (new installs only) similar to the main doc, and keep some instructions to transition existing servers if desired?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@boruszak Can you please check the wording in here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this section on log verification still relevant info even when WAL is defaulted on?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Log verification is enabled by default now as part of WAL. The reasoning is that it have minimal impact but great benefits in case of bugs.
I will double check if it's documented as part of the logstore config properly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.