Add functions to configure the MPU for privileged mode#4
Open
samcrow wants to merge 5 commits intohelium:masterfrom
Open
Add functions to configure the MPU for privileged mode#4samcrow wants to merge 5 commits intohelium:masterfrom
samcrow wants to merge 5 commits intohelium:masterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Even when using only privileged-mode code in an application, the MPU can be useful to detect stack overflow and other memory access problems. For this to work, the MPU needs to restrict privileged-mode code.
Proposed changes
I propose to add a
configurefunction in the M0 and M4 modules that can configure access permissions for both privileged and unprivileged modes in all the combinations that the hardware supports.This is not a breaking change. The existing
Regionstruct andconfigure_unprivilegedfunctions can still be used as before.The updated code is working correctly on my Cortex-M4 microcontroller.